El mié., 10 de jun. de 2020 a la(s) 20:16, Nicolás Alvarez
(nicolas.alva...@gmail.com) escribió:
>
> El mié., 10 de jun. de 2020 a la(s) 20:06, Carson Black
> (uhh...@gmail.com) escribió:
> >
> > Currently, #kde-devel is not set up with an IRC bridge to Telegram,
> > meaning users cannot access it
Yes, in general, user friendliness is a benefit that's rather important,
especially when you're trying to encourage a platform to be used by more
people.
Nate
On 6/10/20 5:14 PM, Jacky Alcine wrote:
The only "benefit" here seems to be user friendliness (HTTP is ancient and C++
is but both a
El mié., 10 de jun. de 2020 a la(s) 20:06, Carson Black
(uhh...@gmail.com) escribió:
>
> Currently, #kde-devel is not set up with an IRC bridge to Telegram,
> meaning users cannot access it from Telegram.
>
> Plugging it into our current bridge infrastructure would have the
> following benefits:
>
The only "benefit" here seems to be user friendliness (HTTP is ancient and C++
is but both are still used)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, at 16:07, Nate Graham wrote:
> +1 if even only for the new contributor friendliness angle. Many other
> channels are bridged to Telegram; probably this one should be a
+1 if even only for the new contributor friendliness angle. Many other
channels are bridged to Telegram; probably this one should be as well.
Nate
On 6/10/20 5:05 PM, Carson Black wrote:
Currently, #kde-devel is not set up with an IRC bridge to Telegram,
meaning users cannot access it from T
Currently, #kde-devel is not set up with an IRC bridge to Telegram,
meaning users cannot access it from Telegram.
Plugging it into our current bridge infrastructure would have the
following benefits:
- Telegram-only users (yes, those exist because neither IRC nor Matrix
are suitable for their need
