Re: Kdiff3 1.11.4 is not updating the correct display version during the setup installation

isplay version > during the setup installation > > [You don't often get email from hi-an...@yandex.ru. Learn why this is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > CCing Michael Reeves to the discussion. > > On Thu, 2024-09-26 at 11:05 +0200,

Re: Kdiff3 1.11.4 is not updating the correct display version during the setup installation

splay version during > the setup installation > > [You don't often get email from hi-an...@yandex.ru. Learn why this is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > CCing Michael Reeves to the discussion. > > On Thu, 2024-09-26 at 11:05 +0200,

Re: CI moved to Qt 6.7 for Linux builds

kdiff3 will make one or two releases but needs only frameworks. This support will end in three months. master is qt6 only now. Apr 20, 2024 8:35:40 PM Ben Cooksley : > Hi all, > > I have just flipped the switch that has moved the CI system over to using Qt > 6.7 for Linux builds on our SUSE im

KDIff3 Craft CI for MacOS broken

Does anyone have insight as to why this is happeing: /Resources/qml/org/kde/i18n/localeData/libki18nlocaledataqmlplugin.dylib'] succeeded with exit code 0 Library dependency '/Users/gitlab/ws/builds/GZwHuM5x/0/sdk/kdiff3/macos-arm-clang/build/extragear/kdiff3/archive/Applications/KDE/kdiff3.app/C

Re: Retiring Phabricator - Migrating tasks to Gitlab

What's the plan for sys admin tickets currently needed to publish releases? May 26, 2023 5:10:43 PM Ben Cooksley : > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 9:31 AM Nate Graham wrote: >> On 5/23/23 03:48, Ben Cooksley wrote:>     Also, in Phabricator, Tasks >> have no real "home"; they just have project >>>   

Re: MR Gardening - A discussion, please leave your input!

KDiff3 is in a similar position to GCompris and would not at this benefit from auto closing or extra messaging on MR's Mar 6, 2023 3:29:12 PM Johnny Jazeix : > Hi, > > for GCompris, we don't have a lot of MR and even if some are old, we still > plan to take over them at some point (we know whi

Re: Gitlab CI Dashboards and retirement of build.kde.org

I now have no way to even test macosx builds for kdiff3, I have no access to a 64bit Intel mac. What are the plans for this and Windows builds. I have a functional windows based craft installed locally. Sep 3, 2022 12:47:06 AM Ben Cooksley : > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:44 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:

Re: New cmake warning.

That would only affect people who manually update ECM and in that case the error comes first. So warning isn't much use to projects like kdiff3 which don't encourage ot support this kind of wierdness anyway On Tue, May 3, 2022, 12:26 PM Thomas Friedrichsmeier < thomas.friedrichsme...@kdemail.net>

New cmake warning.

Could someone please explain why this warning was add to FindKF5.cmake: CMake Warning (dev) at /usr/share/ECM/modules/ECMFindModuleHelpers.cmake:112 (message): Your project should require at least CMake 3.16.0 to use FindKF5.cmake Call Stack (most recent call first): /usr/share/ECM/find-modul

Re: KDiff3 Missing translation in craft

What would be needed to build from a tar ball on Windows. I have a craft setup locally but it likes to use git. Jan 21, 2022 2:10:19 PM Ben Cooksley : > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 7:52 AM Michael Reeves wrote: >> This is being cross posted because I am not subscribed to kde-window and &

Re: KDiff3 Missing translation in craft

Thanks. On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:10 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 7:52 AM Michael Reeves > wrote: > >> This is being cross posted because I am not subscribed to kde-window and >> replies have not shown up in mail archives when I contacted that list for

KDiff3 Missing translation in craft

This is being cross posted because I am not subscribed to kde-window and replies have not shown up in mail archives when I contacted that list for other issues. The bug in question is here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442607 As far as I can see the setup for kdiff3 is correct but does no

Re: Incoming availability of Windows CI for Gitlab and deprecation of build.kde.org

What is the status for MacOS builds? Jan 9, 2022 4:34:38 AM Ben Cooksley : > Hi all, > > Over the past week substantial work has meant that we now have a successfully > compiling seed job for Frameworks on Windows under Gitlab. > > This is a significant step on the road to announcing general a

Re: Announcing General Availability of Gitlab CI for Linux, FreeBSD and Android

Where are the artifacts being uploaded to? They don't seem to show in gitlab. In particular the coverage report is of interest to me. On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 1:31 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > As mentioned in the subject, i'm happy to announce the general > availability of native Gitlab C

Re: Gitlab CI - Inbound

How do we get a visual on exactly which lines are covered by auto testing and which aren't?

KDiff3 1.9.3 Released

Michael Reeves May 19, 2021, 7:24 PM KDiff3 1.9.3 is now released. It can be found at http://download.kde.org/stable/kdiff3/kdiff3-1.9.3.tar.xz.mirrorlist kdiff3-1.9.3.tar.xz.mirrorlist MacOS X and Windows 64 bit binaries have also been released. Fixes multiple regressions in file

Re: Progress is good for us but bad for documentation

One thing the seems entirely missing is any documentation what so ever of craft's runtime confurable options. I'm talking things maintainers can do in their config scripts not the end-user config file which is self documented. On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 1:27 PM Frederik Schwarzer wrote: > > > On 6/9/2

Re: Craft windows build broken for Kdiff3

The default has been set back to 1.69.0 to resolve the more general breakage. However kdiff3 can not use this version of boost headers and will block at config time by design.

Craft windows build broken for Kdiff3

https://build.kde.org/job/Extragear/job/kdiff3/job/kf5-qt5%20WindowsMSVCQt5.15/ KDiff3 requires boost-headers 1.71.0 or later due to an MSVC specific link time bug See https://github.com/boostorg/safe_numerics/issues/71. Craft however is refusing to take the updated configuration files into accoun

Re: [kdiff3] [Bug 436826] kdiff3 has no window, wayland, gnome

Based on https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/217 I am terminating support for gnome/wayland unless and until gnome stops force client side decoration on everyone. On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 9:16 AM Michael Reeves wrote: > > Could some familaur with Wayland/gnome client side deco

Re: [kdiff3] [Bug 436826] kdiff3 has no window, wayland, gnome

Could some familaur with Wayland/gnome client side decorating have a look at this? I have a suspicion gnome is trying to force this feature on kdiff3. On Sun, May 23, 2021, 4:27 AM wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436826 > > solot...@gmail.com changed: > >What|Remove

KDiff3 1.9.2 Realsed

This is a fix for 436958 previous 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 releases should be disregarded. KDiff3 1.9.2 is now released. It can be found at https://download.kde.org/stable/kdiff3/ kdiff3-1.9.2.tar.xz.mirrorlist MacOS X and Windows 64 bit binaries have also been released. File processing should be much fa

Re: KDiff Bug 436958

That's a crash in the implicit default constructor of QTemporaryFile. And that would be a Qt bug if its reproducible. You sure you have the current 1.9 branch and built from that? On Wed, May 12, 2021, 7:30 PM Aleix Pol wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:00 AM Michael Reeves

Re: KDiff Bug 436958

Thanks do we have the text of the assert? On Wed, May 12, 2021, 7:30 PM Aleix Pol wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:00 AM Michael Reeves > wrote: > > > > Could someone other than myself please have a look at this. > > > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?i

KDiff Bug 436958

Could someone other than myself please have a look at this. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436958 None of these issues affect my system. I strongly suspect a distro specific issue. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789330. The offending commit makes no sense as a true root cause. I wo

KDiff3 1.9.0 released

KDiff3 1.9.0 is now released. It can be found at https://download.kde.org/stable/kdiff3/ kdiff3-1.9.0.tar.xz.mirrorlist MacOS X and Windows 64 bit binaries have also been released. File processing should be much faster now. The contetual menu is fixed on Windows. Known Issues/Limitations: *As o

Re: CI testing with local files

Thanks. On Thu, Jan 28, 2021, 2:17 PM Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote: > On Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2021 10:20:54 CET Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:36 -0500, Michael Reeves wrote: > > > Is there way to reading and writing small files in the CI? I'm

CI testing with local files

Is there way to reading and writing small files in the CI? I'm in the process of writing auto tests for kdiff3.

KDiff3 1.8.5 Release Notes

KDiff3 1.8.5 is now released. It can be found at https://download.kde.org/stable/kdiff3/ kdiff3-1.8.5.tar.xz.mirrorlist MacOS X and Windows 64 bit binaries have also been released. Known Issues/Limitations: *As of this time binary comparison has been temporarily disabled due to stability conce

Failing KDiff3 build due to kf5 internal dependency issue

KDiff3 MacOS X build at binary factory is failing with the fallowing error: 16:04:13 CMake Error at /Users/packaging/Craft/BinaryFactory/macos-64-clang/dev-utils/cmake-base/CMake.app/Contents/share/cmake-3.19/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:218 (message): 16:04:13Could NOT find Qt

KIO::UDSEntry support in kdiff3

I have added support for KIO::UDSEntry::UDS_LOCAL_PATH in master this will be part of the upcoming 1.9 branch. Also the detection of links via KIO has been fixed. This is fixed in the 1.8 branch official release of 1.8.5 will come late today or tomorrow. Display name support is planned for master

Fwd: [sdk/kdiff3] src: Disable problematic clazy warnings

arded message - From: Michael Reeves Date: Fri, Dec 18, 2020, 5:02 PM Subject: [sdk/kdiff3] src: Disable problematic clazy warnings To: Git commit 4b319434a0a0e9c11f3de358bb307dca75750fb7 by Michael Reeves. Committed on 18/12/2020 at 21:58. Pushed by mreeves into branch 'master&

Re: MacOS signing issue.

e putting it into the dmg. That said > iirc signing the app is a requirement before submitting the app to apple's > notarization service in the first place. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:12 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 6:08 AM Michael Reeves >>

Re: MacOS signing issue.

e submitting the app to apple's > notarization service in the first place. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:12 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 6:08 AM Michael Reeves >> wrote: >> >>> Could someone familiar with the CI and OS X signing

MacOS signing issue.

Could someone familiar with the CI and OS X signing machinism look at this. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428062 I have no way to test or fix this issue. Which as far as I know is an issue with the CI on binary factory.

KDiff3 1.8.4 Release Notes

KDiff3 1.8.4 is now released. It can be found at https://download.kde.org/stable/kdiff3/ kdiff3-1.8.4.tar.xz.mirrorlist MacOS X and Windows 64 bit binaries have also been released. Known Issues/Limitations: *As of this time binary comparison has been temporarily disabled due to stability con

Re: KDiff3 1.8.3 Release Notes

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, 10:44 AM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > There's an old web page on sourceforge, have you tried to get this removed? > I should have access now. > > You can add release into to the appstream file to get that onto > kde.org/applications >

Re: KDiff3 1.8.3 Release Notes

ff-utility/9ndvvx243rfh?activetab=pivot:overviewtab# > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/p/kdiff-3-diff-utility/9ndvvx243rfh?activetab=pivot:overviewtab*__;Iw!!KGKeukY!kFQYtIg2DbY-nE60gJ9qlbisy_SQ_J0GDRtJZnuyib3bLFshe2--mUU9Xe7Go_yUCw$> > > Jonathan >

KDiff3 1.8.3 Release Notes

KDiff3 1.8.3 is now released. It can be found at https://download.kde.org/stable/kdiff3/ kdiff3-1.8.3.tar.xz.mirrorlist MacOS X and Windows 64 bit binaries have also been released. Known Issues/Limitations: *As of this time binary comparison has been temporarily disabled due to stability concer

Re: Shift for parts of the CI system to Qt 5.15

Is there a record of the work done so far? It looks like some of the errors look like the result off missing #include *.moc. I only know having run into this myself. Usually in clang/gcc. Not sure why this would show up only in MSVC. I can investigate when I get home. I build kdiff3 for windows so

Re: KDiff3 on macosx

It case it wasn't clear the first time my issue isn't so much finding the error message itself as determining how to fix it. On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 2:02 PM Michael Reeves wrote: > > Can someone with a working osx craft setup please look at why KDiff3 is > failing on build factory? >

KDiff3 on macosx

Can someone with a working osx craft setup please look at why KDiff3 is failing on build factory?

Re: Get Hot New Stuff - Legacy Endpoints and Multiple Requests (Discover?)

There seems to be some sort of ssl certificate issue with autoconfig.kde.org. On kubuntu this triggers a warning as soon as discover starts that may be a contributing factor. On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 4:20 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > While diagnosing an issue this evening with cdn.kde.org,

Re: General Infrastructure Maintainability: API and EBN

Some of what ebn is doing in terms of linting c/c++ code would be better moved to clazy/clang-tidy plugins. The current scan for functions such open false positives for strings and comments. This is just open example of the limits imposed by not having a compilers eye view of the code. I personally

Re: CI system maintainability

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 6:36 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 28. März 2019, 09:29:22 CET schrieb Kevin Ottens: > > Hello, > > > > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 09:16:11 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > Please note that the commits in this instance were pushed without > > > review, so

Re: Fwd: PVS-Studio KDE analysis

On Friday, October 03, 2014 4:24:01 AM Christoph Feck wrote: > On Friday 03 October 2014 02:53:37 Boris Egorov wrote: > > On 10/02/2014 04:45 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > Okay, can you confirm whether we're allowed to publish this > > > publicly or not? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ben > > > > Svyato