On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 3:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
>
> When reviewing the list of CI builds projects have enabled, it is important
> to consider to what degree your project benefits from having various builds
> enabled. One common pattern i've seen is having Alpine, SUSE Qt 6.9 and SUSE
> Qt
On Samstag, 19. April 2025 21:29:07 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Ben Cooksley
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 7:21 AM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > Sounds like we shouldn't be so trigger-happy clicking the Rebase button on
> > our
> > MRs when it's not really necessary. We could rebase locally and the
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 3:05 AM Thomas Friedrichsmeier <
thomas.friedrichsme...@kdemail.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 07:25:36 +1200
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
> [...]
> > This morning I ran a basic query to ascertain the top 20 projects for
> > CI time utilisation on invent.kde.org which revealed
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 1:50 AM Linus Jahn wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:23:59 +0100
> David Edmundson wrote:
>
> > >Realistically merge requests shouldn't be proposed until people are
> > >ready to get something reviewed and merged in...
> >
> > That's not realistic with how it is on the fron
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 12:24 AM David Edmundson
wrote:
> >Realistically merge requests shouldn't be proposed until people are ready
> to get something reviewed and merged in...
>
> That's not realistic with how it is on the frontlines. The earlier we
> share feedback the better, and reviews can
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 3:05 AM Thomas Friedrichsmeier <
thomas.friedrichsme...@kdemail.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 07:25:36 +1200
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
> [...]
> > This morning I ran a basic query to ascertain the top 20 projects for
> > CI time utilisation on invent.kde.org which revealed
On Samstag, 19. April 2025 10:33:45 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Ben Cooksley
wrote:
> A big part of the issue here is our rebase centric workflow - normally with
> Gitlab you use merge commits and in this workflow CI only runs when the MR
> changes.
> With a rebase workflow like ours though, othe
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 7:21 AM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Samstag, 19. April 2025 10:33:45 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Ben
> Cooksley
> wrote:
> > A big part of the issue here is our rebase centric workflow - normally
> with
> > Gitlab you use merge commits and in this workflow CI only runs when
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 07:25:36 +1200
Ben Cooksley wrote:
[...]
> This morning I ran a basic query to ascertain the top 20 projects for
> CI time utilisation on invent.kde.org which revealed the following:
What (rough) percentage is that of the total? I.e. is the problem more
one of a few projects h
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:23:59 +0100
David Edmundson wrote:
> >Realistically merge requests shouldn't be proposed until people are
> >ready to get something reviewed and merged in...
>
> That's not realistic with how it is on the frontlines. The earlier we
> share feedback the better, and review
>Realistically merge requests shouldn't be proposed until people are ready to
>get something reviewed and merged in...
That's not realistic with how it is on the frontlines. The earlier we
share feedback the better, and reviews can take many many iterations.
There's a "CI_MERGE_REQUEST_APPROVED"
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:47 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> - FreeBSD Qt 6.9 monitors buildability on BSD libc + Clang + Qt 6.9
FreeBSD is at Qt 6.8 at the moment. We're close to updating to 6.9 though.
On Sat, 2025-04-19 at 20:33 +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:07 PM Vlad Zahorodnii
> wrote:
> > On 4/19/25 10:53 AM, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thanks for looking into this.
> > >
> > > It seems a major contributor to CI time is the fact that a merge
> > >
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 7:25 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Over the past week or two there have been a number of complaints regarding
> CI builder availability which i've done some investigating into this
> morning.
>
> Part of this is related to the Windows CI builders falling offline due
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:05 PM laurent Montel wrote:
> Le vendredi 18 avril 2025, 21:25:36 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Ben
> Cooksley a écrit :
> > Hi all,
>
> > Ruqola: Appears to be conducting a development process whereby changes
> are
> > made in stable then immediately merged to master in
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:07 PM Vlad Zahorodnii
wrote:
> On 4/19/25 10:53 AM, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for looking into this.
> >
> > It seems a major contributor to CI time is the fact that a merge
> > request runs and once merged, master runs another pretty much
> > identic
On 4/19/25 10:53 AM, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Hi,
thanks for looking into this.
It seems a major contributor to CI time is the fact that a merge
request runs and once merged, master runs another pretty much
identical pipeline right after that.
As for KWin: Not sure which one we could axe. KWi
Le vendredi 18 avril 2025, 21:25:36 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Ben Cooksley
a écrit :
> Hi all,
> Ruqola: Appears to be conducting a development process whereby changes are
> made in stable then immediately merged to master in a ever continuing loop.
> Please discontinue this behaviour and onl
18 matches
Mail list logo
