Review Request 126249: Fix apidoc format

: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126249/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Frederik Schwarzer

Re: Review Request 126249: Fix apidoc format

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126249/#review91464 --- Ping? - Frederik Schwarzer On Dec. 5, 2015, 8:38 a.m

Re: Review Request 126249: Fix apidoc format

#a17631774b47cddb0127d8a3c1fc2315c Diffs - src/core/storedtransferjob.h 3f267c9 src/core/transferjob.h 6d78793 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126249/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Frederik Schwarzer

KRandom broken?

Hi, it seems as if KRandom is currently broken. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362161 Given the potential impact, is there something to be done (besides fixing it) wrt distro packagers? Regards

Re: KRandom regression + fix

Am 27.04.2016 08:48 schrieb Johannes Huber: Hi Johannes, KRandom saw a regression in KCoreAddon's 5.21.0 release, which impacts a wide range of applications and use cases. Since the rand() was not seeded, the numbers generated were predictable, which is ugly in games and probably alarming for

Re: KRandom regression + fix

Am 27.04.2016 23:45 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: El dimecres, 27 d’abril de 2016, a les 11:42:46 CEST, Frederik Schwarzer va escriure: Am 27.04.2016 08:48 schrieb Johannes Huber: > thanks for the patch. When i read "randon numbers were predictable" > instantly > a alarm be

Progress is good for us but bad for documentation

Hi, we are all making progress but the way to notice it can be painful. Looking at something you created years ago might make you cringe, but that's actually a good sign. It indicates, that you made progress. KDE is making progress as well. Here the indicator is outdated documentation. There

Re: Progress is good for us but bad for documentation

On 6/9/21 6:02 PM, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021, 01:20:23 CEST schrieb Frederik Schwarzer: I would like to ask you to report such documentation to me. We see the topic come up here and there but it then sometimes sinks into oblivion again because it was part of a

Re: Top 15 Mailinglists with messages in moderation

On 01/03/2011, Harri Porten wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > >>> 34 kfm-devel >> >> I could help with this one. > > I do keep an eye on messages held back btw. As long as there's just spam I > don't bother logging in to clean it up. Granted, this is slightly risky so > a

Re: 4.6 branches created in git again

On 22/03/2011, Ian Monroe wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 18:13, Alex Merry wrote: >> On 21/03/11 20:17, Alexander Neundorf wrote: >>> >>> On Monday 21 March 2011, Ian Monroe wrote: Ben did add this block to his hook. Hooray. :) I'm thinking I should just go ahead and rename

Re: Top 15 Mailinglists with messages in moderation May 1st

[Tom Albers - Sonntag, 1. Mai 2011 16:00:57] > Hi, > > New month, new list. If lists are unused, let me know, I will delete them. If > someone wants to help with moderation for any of these list, let me know as > well. > 19 kde-news-de You can put me in change here. I will look into the

Re: Review Request: Display the tab title on root (/) folder properly in konqueror filemanager mode

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101374/#review3371 --- konqueror/src/konqview.cpp

Re: Review Request: Display the tab title on root (/) folder properly in konqueror filemanager mode

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101374/#review3375 --- WRT the parenthesis ... the outermost if statement breaks before

Review Request: Replace doxygen tag @arg by @param.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101596/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Summary --- The @param doxygen tag is for

Re: Review Request: Replace doxygen tag @arg by @param.

/r/101596/#review3866 --- On June 12, 2011, 7:59 p.m., Frederik Schwarzer wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewb

Review Request for Kannasaver

Hi, I would like to move Kannasaver, a screen saver that shows Japanese characters, from playground to extragear. It sits on git.kde.org already, so the current URL is https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdereview/kannasaver (check the repository page for Git URLs) This is the first version for KDE

Review Request: Do not patch strings that can be combined.

://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104712/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Frederik Schwarzer