Licensing policy change proposal

This email puts forth for your consideration a proposal to change our current licensing policy to accommodate three more licenses that cover the new photographic selection of wallpapers in https://phabricator.kde.org/D18078. The licenses are: - the Pexels license: https://www.pexels.com/photo-lice

Re: Licensing policy change proposal

> On 27 Jan 2019, at 15:04, Krešimir Čohar wrote: > > This email puts forth for your consideration a proposal to change our current > licensing policy to accommodate three more licenses that cover the new > photographic selection of wallpapers in https://phabricator.kde.org/D18078. > > The li

Re: Licensing policy change proposal

Since all of these mostly boil down to CC0, I'll only comment on it. > > https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html > > CC0 should be uncontroversial, it should be definitely allowed by our > license policy. If I'm not mistaken, none of the licenses we allow at the moment is a "public domain"-like

Re: Licensing policy change proposal

On 1/27/19 11:39 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote: I'm generally leaning against licenses like these - even if authors (of code, of art, etc.) allow us to forget them, I like giving credit where credit's due. Just because the license *allows* non-attribution, that doesn't mean we have to not attribute the

Re: Licensing policy change proposal

On 2019-01-27, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >> On 27 Jan 2019, at 15:04, Krešimir Čohar wrote: >> >> This email puts forth for your consideration a proposal to change our >> current licensing policy to accommodate three more licenses that cover the >> new photographic selection of wallpapers in >

Re: Licensing policy change proposal

Hello, > On 27. Jan 2019, at 19:39, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Since all of these mostly boil down to CC0, I'll only comment on it. > >>> https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html >>> >> >> CC0 should be uncontroversial, it should be definitely allowed by our