[Discover] [Bug 407807] Discover says it is offline when tryint to update

2019-08-16 Thread celsner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407807 celsner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||els...@mpe.mpg.de -- You are receiving this mail

[Discover] [Bug 407807] Discover says it is offline when tryint to update

2019-08-16 Thread celsner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407807 --- Comment #1 from celsner --- Same here. Discover says it's offline, while the network is doing ok. Even this bug reporting works from within Discover. Error mesg: "Keine Netzwerkverbindung verfügbar / Cannot download packages whilst of

[Discover] [Bug 407807] Discover says it is offline when tryint to update

2019-08-20 Thread celsner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407807 --- Comment #5 from celsner --- small addition: the update message in the system tray works correctly and acknowlidges pending updates. And yes, apt works ok. Thanks to anyone looking into this! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Discover] [Bug 405465] New: Discover systray Icon and Discover Pgm Windows do not show the same nr. of updates available.

2019-03-14 Thread celsner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405465 Bug ID: 405465 Summary: Discover systray Icon and Discover Pgm Windows do not show the same nr. of updates available. Product: Discover Version: 5.15.3 Platform: Other

[Discover] [Bug 405465] Discover systray Icon and Discover Pgm Windows do not show the same nr. of updates available.

2019-03-14 Thread celsner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405465 --- Comment #2 from celsner --- I presume flatpak is installed. At least Discover lists "Flathub - dl.flathub.org" in the Sources panel. "flatpak update" listed two, which I then installed: --- Looking for updates...

[Discover] [Bug 405465] Discover systray Icon and Discover Pgm Windows do not show the same nr. of updates available.

2019-03-14 Thread celsner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405465 celsner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED --- Comment #4 from celsner --- (In reply to