https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465554
Bug ID: 465554
Summary: Using of known people in a new environment
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: 8.0.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465434
Bug ID: 465434
Summary: Problems with face recognition.
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: 7.10.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465434
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
Ok. I understand.
But my problem is, that Face detection is not running correctly. Sometimes, the
progress bar stand still by 0% for more than 2 days. Sometimes, the process run
in only a few seconcds without
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465434
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Bach ---
And i understand right: YOLO is only for detection of faces in some special
conditionsd. Not for the learning of the faces?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465434
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Bach ---
Sorry Maik,
at the moment, i am installing the 8.0 Beta. I know, that should not done in a
production evironment but i have a test system here. Will look what happens and
perhaps make a rollback. But by the last try
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465434
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Bach ---
But if it helps. I tried to view at the processes in this scenario and i could
see, that only a few of bytes was written on the journal db.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465462
Bug ID: 465462
Summary: Writing Metadata changes immediatly to files
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: 8.0.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465434
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Bach ---
Also with 8.0 beta, the scanning process is stopping. Disabling YOLO has no
effect. After disabling using all kernels, the process works. Will try to
reproduce this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465462
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Bach ---
Sorry, my fault. I have not seen the rigtht options. Metadata writing is
working well,
Thomas
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465462
Thomas Bach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487589
Bug ID: 487589
Summary: Cannot see the recycle bin
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: 8.4.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
Statu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487589
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
Tx for the answer.
I installed the actual version but nothing is changed. Cannot see the trash
folder
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maik Qualmann
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Mai 2024 16:34
An: Thomas Bach
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487589
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Bach ---
Ok. Tx
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maik Qualmann
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Mai 2024 17:45
An: Thomas Bach
Betreff: [digikam] [Bug 487589] Cannot see the recycle bin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440503
Bug ID: 440503
Summary: Cannot use Google Mas
Product: digikam
Version: 7.4.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436544
Bug ID: 436544
Summary: Problem by Face recognition
Product: digikam
Version: 7.3.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436544
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
It is not a production environement so that is not a really problem for me. I
try to understand, whats happened her. Which logs do ypu need and where can i
find theses
Thomas
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436544
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Bach ---
You are rigth,
the pictures with this info come from another source. And there is a metadate
with this entry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437193
Bug ID: 437193
Summary: Starting Digikam with defined search
Product: digikam
Version: 7.3.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
Status: REPORTED
S
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437193
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
Yes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437193
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Bach ---
TX
Thomas
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435272
Bug ID: 435272
Summary: No entries in recogition databases
Product: digikam
Version: 7.3.0
Platform: Other
OS: Other
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435272
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
Tx. Will try it.
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maik Qualmann
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. April 2021 19:21
An: Thomas Bach
Betreff: [digikam] [Bug 435272] No entries in recogition databases
https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435349
Bug ID: 435349
Summary: Install digikam on a synology nas
Product: digikam
Version: 7.3.0
Platform: Other
OS: Other
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
P
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435349
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
Synology has Linux as System. With a client on Windows, all traffic for
changing Database and picture metadat are transferred over the lan. And that
results in a poor performance. Also, if the system is isntalled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435349
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Bach ---
And Synology has many packkages working as client
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435351
Bug ID: 435351
Summary: Whats the datebes KDTREe
Product: digikam
Version: 7.3.0
Platform: Other
OS: Microsoft Windows
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435351
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Bach ---
Tx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435701
Bug ID: 435701
Summary: Exif date change
Product: digikam
Version: 7.2.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435701
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
Yes, i tried this. But the problem is, that i cannot use the exif date from the
first picture in a slection as base and then add 1 second differece to any
other picture in the selection.
Lets try to explain:
I have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435701
Thomas Bach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435701
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Bach ---
Works perfect. Tx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435881
Bug ID: 435881
Summary: Date change in renaming tool
Product: digikam
Version: 7.3.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435881
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Bach ---
Sorry, what did you mean with the unique operator?
Thomas
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435881
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Bach ---
Is the advanced renaming tool different from the renaming toll (F2) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435881
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Bach ---
Not sure, which workflow you mean
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435881
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Bach ---
Meanwhile, i found the uniqe operator. But there is another problem. How can i
filter about that operator?
If i use them a number with prefix _ is added to the name like Canon 28_01_01
10_00_00_1. Ok, i could filter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435881
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Bach ---
Ok. I will try it. But if ha have more than 9 pictures with the same datetime,
i got two digits at the end.
Will it be possible to add an option to the uniqe attribut to add any text like
double?
Thomas
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435920
Bug ID: 435920
Summary: Unique Parameter not working correctly by large
collections
Product: digikam
Version: 7.3.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435920
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Bach ---
Additional Info:
Seems, it is a problem of the file name length. First, i changed all Picture
with the Number flag to get a uniqe filename. Then, if i use the unique
parameter, all files are extend with the unique
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435920
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Bach ---
Ok. Last workaround:
I use [meta:Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal]{unique:4} to rename the files. After
that, i can filter with *_.* (They are also some files not as jpeg) and
find the duplicates. Not the perfect way
40 matches
Mail list logo
