https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384485
--- Comment #12 from Kartik ---
Gilles, this bug report may be closed now. I have implemented functionality, to
reject Faces if the Red Minus Button is pressed.
Kartik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396
--- Comment #22 from Kartik ---
Gilles, this bug report may be closed now.
Here's the new Feature in case anyone's interested to see:
https://imgur.com/a/CKVopzi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392023
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423114
--- Comment #4 from Kartik ---
Gilles, this bug may be closed. This feature is not needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415604
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415565
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423387
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396
--- Comment #19 from Kartik ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #17)
> The digiKam Icon View knows categories. I would find it better if the person
> name is the category and thus the people are grouped. That would be much
> clearer.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396
--- Comment #20 from Kartik ---
Just to update, storing maps of tag regions to suggested names is definitely
feasible. I'll go forward with this approach to implement categorization based
on Suggested Names. This will lead to categorization of si
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423113
--- Comment #5 from Kartik ---
Hi Nghia,
The Top Level Connections for the Deleting button are done in DigikamItemView.
The Delete Button forms part of a FaceRejectionOverlay, and the signal for
pressing the delete button is set here:
https
e possible that this
is just a problem in my branch.
Kartik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423113
--- Comment #1 from Kartik ---
(In reply to Kartik from comment #0)
> SUMMARY
> If a user accidentally confirms a face, and then to correct it, deletes the
> face, still Facial Recognition uses information from the confirm operation.
>
t;. Please check if this bug is
reproducible, in case it's just a problem with my branch.
Kartik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386295
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423114
--- Comment #2 from Kartik ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1)
> But a face that I delete should never be found again. The fact that we need
> a way to get it back is another matter. Again, how users imagine it and how
> y
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423113
--- Comment #3 from Kartik ---
Hi Maik, rebuilding the training database is certainly a good idea to avoid
this error. I wasn't aware that feature existed.
It's certainly desirable for Faces to remain in the database, if an Image is
delete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586
--- Comment #5 from Kartik ---
Thanks for the reply Gilles. I've gone through the files that you mentioned.
I understand that the TagFolderView in PeopleSidebar, keeps tracks of tags as
TAlbums, which are created based on the name that we assi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586
--- Comment #6 from Kartik ---
I'm currently trying to fix the duplicate bug 416180.
Confirming/Rejecting a face is dealt by DigikamItemView::confirmFaces() (and
rejectFaces()) respectively. Maybe there could be an implementation at the end
of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586
--- Comment #9 from Kartik ---
Thanks a lot for the suggestions, Maik. I never checked the libs/database
folder, this really improved my understanding.
Whenever we confirm/reject face suggestions, the database is written to by
CoreDB
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586
--- Comment #10 from Kartik ---
The method I proposed does update the new count, however it always trails
behind the actual situation by 1 image.
For eg. if I had 7 new unconfirmed faces, and I confirmed one, the count will
not decrement immediately
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586
--- Comment #11 from Kartik ---
Update: I have resolved the issue.
In CoreDB::AddImageTagProperty
I added d->db->recordChangeset(TagChangeset(tagId, TagChangeset::Added));
In CoreDB::removeImageTagProperties
I added d->db->rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586
--- Comment #13 from Kartik ---
I have made a merge request.
https://invent.kde.org/kde/digikam/-/merge_requests/12
Thanks for all the help Marc , Maik and Gilles :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349564
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384396
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384485
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Kartik
around with the arrow keys, and whichever
other face he wishes to apply the same tag to, he may simply press enter for
it.
I would like to implement this feature in DigiKam.
Kartik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419040
Bug ID: 419040
Summary: [Request] Provide Option to Select Album to apply
Facial Recognition on
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419040
--- Comment #3 from Kartik ---
Ah, so the Facial Recognition Algorithm does not realise what albums are? It
only works on the entire set of unknown faces created by the Detection process?
In that case would the latter part of my initial report be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419047
Bug ID: 419047
Summary: Closing Face Tag Delete Dialog Box still ends up
deleting face tag
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
St
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419047
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279372
Kartik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartikx2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Kartik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279372
--- Comment #5 from Kartik ---
Hello Maik,
I've made a merge request to display File Size in status bar. I'm working on
implementing the Right Side Bar currently.
https://invent.kde.org/kde/digikam/-/merge_requests/18
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279372
--- Comment #7 from Kartik ---
Hello Maik,
I had some doubts regarding the Stack View implementation.
Currently, ItemPropertiesTab is inheriting DExpanderBox. I plan to implement a
QStackedLayout within the constructor of ItemPropertiesTab, and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279372
--- Comment #9 from Kartik ---
Hello Gilles,
I've submitted a patch for the implementation you suggested.
https://invent.kde.org/kde/digikam/-/merge_requests/20
Thanks
Kartik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361693
Kartik C changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kartiksc...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
36 matches
Mail list logo
