https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396444
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385412
--- Comment #14 from Julian Seward ---
I looked at the patches. They all seem fine to me, except for one thing
I wasn't happy about: the use of the three dirty helpers to implement PPNO.
In particular I don&#x
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384727
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsew...@acm.org
--- Comment #4 from Julian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396486
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364039
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||azmoo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #64 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386931
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387064
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367890
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386317
--- Comment #2 from Julian Schraner ---
Any update? It'd be great if we knew the current status of this bug for you. If
we do not get a response in the next two weeks, I'll close the report as I
cannot reproduce the behavior locally.
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387217
--- Comment #2 from Julian Schraner ---
Can you confirm that this issue is resolved with a newer version of
Kubuntu/Dolphin? Or do you still experience this bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386453
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386453
--- Comment #4 from Julian Schraner ---
Ah, I misunderstood your description then. Thanks for the quick response and
the screenshot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88194
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385428
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389437
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Severity
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369399
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||junior-jobs
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396545
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384974
--- Comment #6 from Julian Schraner ---
Hello Rafael,
I do understand that you'd like to have this crash fixed (in fact, everybody
would obviously like to resolve this issue), but KDE is a community where every
developer can choose on their own
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396582
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385412
--- Comment #18 from Julian Seward ---
I think this is equivalent:
// getReg(RegisterNumber n) returns the value of GPR number 'n'
// reg1 and reg2 are even
void ppno(RegisterNumber reg1, RegisterNumber reg2) {
switch(getReg(0)) {
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383942
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385412
--- Comment #20 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Vadim Barkov from comment #19)
> (In reply to Julian Seward from comment #18)
> > I think this is equivalent:
Unfortunately I can't think of a way to clean this up without extendi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387652
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127756
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101830
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|kio |kio-extras
Assignee|fa...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102415
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|holger-...@holgis.net |plasma-b...@kde.org
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331729
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|kio |kio-extras
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188989
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82436
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|zip |default
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82438
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385412
--- Comment #22 from Julian Seward ---
Hmm, the first two patches apply without problem. But the third
one fails as follows. Vadim, can you please check they actually
apply to the trunk, for you, and if not, update them so they do?
Also please can
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325173
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|fa...@kde.org |plasma-b...@kde.org
Component|zip
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329579
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Component|zip
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106908
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|kio |kio-extras
Version|3.3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106838
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137543
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230744
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tar |default
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396582
--- Comment #4 from Julian Schraner ---
Okay, thanks for the bug report and your testing :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381483
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393977
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385412
--- Comment #24 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Vadim Barkov from comment #23)
> I've just reproduced the problem you get. I had tried to apply this patches
> with "--dry-run" and got the same error. But without "--dry
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385412
--- Comment #25 from Julian Seward ---
Landed, d44563c49e55f47016e23591f708c7aa57f7a098. Andreas, could
you please checkout and test, when convenient?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380193
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380193
--- Comment #4 from Julian Seward ---
This should just work on 64-bit x86. It won't get fixed on 32-bit though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381096
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381553
--- Comment #74 from Julian Seward ---
Ivo, just to say, thank you for doing all this reg-alloc work.
I know it was a lot of work. The results are good!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376516
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376865
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382034
--- Comment #3 from Julian Seward ---
What is MUSL?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382230
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396810
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382435
--- Comment #2 from Julian Seward ---
The message as it stands is really what I intended. If all heap blocks
are freed then it isn't possible to have any leaks, since there are no
blocks to leak. Hence the wording.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #20 from Julian Seward ---
Petar, can this be closed now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382980
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383516
--- Comment #1 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to micael from comment #0)
> I compiled valgrind again by changing the || defined(VGP_ppc32_linux) to the
> elif statement in the VG_(getgroups) function. Therefore making valgrind use
> a 32
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383602
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384156
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luke...@lukeshu.com
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384337
--- Comment #15 from Julian Seward ---
Ivo, can we close this? I assume that all of these improvements
have long since landed in the v3 allocator (and also, that we're
now shipping v3 by default!) But do let me know if I assume wrongly.
--
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384442
--- Comment #4 from Julian Seward ---
There's a bunch of related hacks in the arm(32) and arm64 front
ends. Grep for "earlyWriteback" or some such. They are probably
related.
The fundamental problem though is that these insn
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376865
--- Comment #3 from Julian Schraner ---
Ah, I figured out why the actions didn't show up when I searched for "Capture":
Those entries are translated (to "Aufnehmen" in german). I'm now also able to
reproduce this b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396810
--- Comment #3 from Julian Schraner ---
Okay, according to the OpenSuse Tumbleweed package history two weeks would
match up pretty well with the release of Dolphin v18.04.3, so it's likely that
a commit between 18.04.2 and 18.04.3 is causing this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396839
--- Comment #2 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Vadim Barkov from comment #1)
> Since valgrind doesn't model exceptions for s390x there is not clear how to
> implement this intstructions.
To see how to implement exceptions, look at th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396894
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385409
--- Comment #11 from Julian Seward ---
Vadim, Andreas, please can you split this into two patches:
* one with all the tests
* one with the final bug-fixed implementation
so it's easier to review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385409
--- Comment #14 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Vadim Barkov from comment #13)
> I've made the union in s390x_dirtyhelper_vec_op volatile and the bug
> magically dissapeared.
>
> Fixed.
No. Just hidden.
More likely is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396932
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Severity
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364868
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364054
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365005
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385199
--- Comment #1 from Julian Seward ---
I'd guess this is because rpmbuild somehow inserted -mthumb as a flag.
I'd furthermore guess that if you built it "by hand" without specifying
any extra flags, you'd get something
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385199
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385386
--- Comment #2 from Julian Seward ---
I can't imagine how this failed. Can you still reproduce it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385707
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387410
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366114
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369497
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369475
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369293
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367073
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365478
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385409
--- Comment #20 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #19)
> (In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #18)
>
> > Another suspicous construct is the type cast
> > (const s390x_vec_op_details_t*) &details
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397101
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397119
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66964
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |18.04.3
Component|tar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51873
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230744
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cole...@transdyn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51873
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from Julian Schraner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230744
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jorge.adri...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55770
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249526
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDSINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266141
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316911
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137027
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328723
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.11.3 |18.04.3
Assignee|mbe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149903
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252821
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396444
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385409
--- Comment #31 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #29)
> Created attachment 114302 [details]
> Use guarded loads in the guest
>
> This patch changes the guest code to use guarded loads.
>
> However,
701 - 800 of 3715 matches
Mail list logo
