[kwin] [Bug 406180] KWin 5.15.4+ hang regression on Nvidia Optimus

2019-05-29 Thread John A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406180 John A changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drjohnny...@gmail.com --- Comment #50 from John A

[kwin] [Bug 406180] KWin 5.15.4+ hang regression on Nvidia Optimus

2019-05-31 Thread John A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406180 --- Comment #54 from John A --- (In reply to Jeffery Patton from comment #51) > (In reply to John A from comment #50) > > I can confirm that the regression appears in Kubuntu 19.04 with kwin > > 5.15.90, an NVIDIA Optimus setup (NVIDIA

[kwin] [Bug 406180] KWin 5.15.4+ hang regression on Nvidia Optimus

2019-05-31 Thread John A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406180 --- Comment #55 from John A --- (In reply to John A from comment #54) > (In reply to Jeffery Patton from comment #51) > > (In reply to John A from comment #50) > > > I can confirm that the regression appears in Kubuntu 19.04 with kwin

[kwin] [Bug 406180] KWin 5.15.4+ hang regression on Nvidia Optimus

2019-06-08 Thread John A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406180 --- Comment #67 from John A --- (In reply to hugues31100 from comment #66) > (In reply to Luca Carlon from comment #65) > > What distro? > > I use Manjaro Download the KWin sources from https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma/$

[kwin] [Bug 406180] KWin 5.15.4+ hang regression on Nvidia Optimus

2019-06-10 Thread John A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406180 --- Comment #71 from John A --- (In reply to Drake from comment #69) > (In reply to Jeffery Patton from comment #68) > > (In reply to John A from comment #67) > > > (In reply to hugues31100 from comment #66) > > > >

[kwin] [Bug 363006] KWin crashed while started after reboot

2017-01-14 Thread John A . Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363006 --- Comment #4 from John A. Ward --- Created attachment 103413 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=103413&action=edit New crash information added by DrKonqi kwin_x11 (5.7.5) using Qt 5.6.2 - What I was doing when the application crash

[kwin] [Bug 363006] KWin crashed while started after reboot

2017-01-14 Thread John A . Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363006 John A. Ward changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@mbstemps.com -- You are receiving this

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-10-24 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 --- Comment #9 from John A. Ward --- (In reply to Bug Janitor Service from comment #8) > ๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 > days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug sta

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-11-12 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 John A. Ward changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.27.11 |6.2.2 --- Comment #12 from John A. Ward

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] New: Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-09-23 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 Bug ID: 493554 Summary: Icons move AFTER being Locked. Classification: Plasma Product: plasmashell Version: git-stable-Plasma/5.27 Platform: Fedora RPMs OS: Linux Stat

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-09-23 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 --- Comment #1 from John A. Ward --- Created attachment 174007 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=174007&action=edit showing icons moving Screens before, and at next day, and next day -- You are receiving this mail because:

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-09-30 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 --- Comment #3 from John A. Ward --- Do you need any further information, why anyone would mandate a move to Wayland when it doesn't work is beyond me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-10-01 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 --- Comment #5 from John A. Ward --- Mr. Graham, I did the upgrade from the Fedora site from Fedora 39 to Fedora 40, so I got whatever Red Hat - Fedora is distributing. What should I do to make the system supportable? I did what I normally do to

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-10-02 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 --- Comment #6 from John A. Ward --- Mr. Graham, I didn't mention that I used the DNF method, somebody should look into that. It sounds like DNF didn't replace KDE with the new version? John > On 10/01/2024 3:03 PM EDT John A

[plasmashell] [Bug 482875] When encountering a "zero screens connected" condition, desktop icons get re-arranged (first time in alphabetical order, then after that randomly)

2024-11-07 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482875 John A. Ward changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@mbstemps.com --- Comment #32 from John A

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-11-27 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 --- Comment #15 from John A. Ward --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2) > How did you manage to get Plasma 5.27 on Fedora KDE 40? Nate, as I wrote earlier, my fault I looked at a fedora 39 computer, the Fedora 40 is currently 6.2.3 --

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-11-27 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 John A. Ward changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.2.2 |6.2.3 --- Comment #16 from John A. Ward

[plasmashell] [Bug 493554] Icons move AFTER being Locked.

2024-11-27 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554 --- Comment #14 from John A. Ward --- I have been doing updates basically every day, the KDE version is 6.2.3 and the problem is still there. There was a message that the problem has been solved in Version 6.3.x, is Fedora going to include the update

[Skanlite] [Bug 456808] Crash when changing scan source or color option

2024-12-27 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456808 John A. Ward changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@mbstemps.com -- You are receiving this

[Skanlite] [Bug 456808] Crash when changing scan source or color option

2024-12-27 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456808 --- Comment #13 from John A. Ward --- I found a solution, the device wasn't scaned by the scanning program, when I called it from Libreoffice it worked fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Skanlite] [Bug 497964] New: skanlie says invalid option?

2024-12-27 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497964 Bug ID: 497964 Summary: skanlie says invalid option? Classification: Applications Product: Skanlite Version: 23.08.5 Platform: Fedora RPMs OS: Linux Status: REPORTED

[Skanlite] [Bug 497145] New: crash when pressing the 'scan' button

2024-12-06 Thread John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497145 Bug ID: 497145 Summary: crash when pressing the 'scan' button Classification: Applications Product: Skanlite Version: 23.08.5 Platform: Fedora RPMs OS: Linux Status: R

[konqueror] [Bug 460969] New: Could not find plugin kcm_cookies

2022-10-25 Thread John A. Bilicki III
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460969 Bug ID: 460969 Summary: Could not find plugin kcm_cookies Classification: Applications Product: konqueror Version: 21.12.3 Platform: Kubuntu OS: Linux Status: REPORTED

[konqueror] [Bug 272550] Benchmark - Failure to give focus to anchors, not triggering event listeners

2018-11-08 Thread John A . Bilicki III
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272550 --- Comment #3 from John A. Bilicki III --- The benchmark is no longer up and I don't have the time to restore it. If I were working on bugs I would have given a bug with the word benchmark top priority as people take such criteria in to consider

[konqueror] [Bug 272550] Benchmark - Failure to give focus to anchors, not triggering event listeners

2018-11-08 Thread John A . Bilicki III
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272550 --- Comment #5 from John A. Bilicki III --- No problem. Looks like I attached the benchmark as intended. I would test it in Firefox 3.6 to see what you should expect. Just look up Firefox FTP to find those older versions, they're not hidden like C