https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390524
--- Comment #2 from Jeff Frontz ---
Note -- the target application is in a regulated industry and the development
environment has all been validated (i.e., changing-up to a later version of gcc
isn't in the cards for quite a while).
Would it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
Bug ID: 390471
Summary: suppression by specification of source-file line
number
Product: valgrind
Version: 3.13.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390524
Bug ID: 390524
Summary: use of 0b prefix for binary constants
Product: valgrind
Version: 3.14 SVN
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390524
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Frontz ---
Converting the constant to a simple 0x10 seems to make everything better (at
least as far as compilation and running on x86 linux).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
--- Comment #4 from Jeff Frontz ---
Created attachment 110691
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=110691&action=edit
Patch against 3.14.0 src & doc to implement/document suppression-by-file
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
--- Comment #5 from Jeff Frontz ---
I'm not sure what the protocol is for creating test cases (I can't seem to get
them to work in my environment) but if someone can give me a pointer, I'll do
my best to create something.
I tested th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390792
Bug ID: 390792
Summary: 'impossible' happened in dh_handle_noninsn_write()
Product: valgrind
Version: 3.14 SVN
Platform: Compiled Sources
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390792
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Frontz ---
I changed the tl_assert(0) in dh_handle_noninsn_write() to print out the
unhandled value (a la 'tl_assert2(0, "part is %d", part);'):
DHAT: dh_main.c:756 (dh_handle_noninsn_write): the 'i
