https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491888
Bug ID: 491888
Summary: DNG files misread as TIFF
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: 8.4.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windows
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491888
--- Comment #2 from Bertil Rolf ---
Created attachment 172745
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=172745&action=edit
DNG file identified as such by ExifTool but falsely marked as TIFF by DigiKam
OK, here's a sample.
--
You a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491888
--- Comment #5 from Bertil Rolf ---
Hello.
The KDE site has a size restriction of 4MB for attachments. So I managed
to select a DNG file that was small. But lots of my DNG files are marked
as TIFF, even though they have a size of about 10 MB.
I did
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491888
--- Comment #7 from Bertil Rolf ---
Hello,
Here's the tarball.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m7rqXguiC6QL5NwiNxlFNLxNV1D9LcTN/view?usp=drive_link
The comment file explains the content.
Best regards
Bertil Rolf
Baden bei Wien
On 2024-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491888
--- Comment #27 from Bertil Rolf ---
Hello!
The new DigiKam digiKam-8.5.0-20240829T162145-Qt6-Win64-debug.exe does
what it should to my DNG photos, fully sized or lossy compressed. Only,
it still marks the lossy compressed DNGs as “TIFF” in the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491888
--- Comment #30 from Bertil Rolf ---
You're right. I hoped the reinstallation would take care of that. After
re-reading metadata, digiKam now works beautifully.
Bertil
On 2024-08-30 11:35, Maik Qualmann wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #2 from Bertil Rolf ---
8.5.0
Build date: 2024-08-29 16:21 (target: RelWithDebInfo)
Revision: 7141aca20964a7f17ef5e678c785c83056e51c57
<https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/commit/7141aca20964a7f17ef5e678c785c83056e51c57>
B
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #4 from Bertil Rolf ---
In the description of the bug, you'll find the link to a zipfile on my
account on Google Drive.
On 2024-10-13 10:17, bugzilla_nore...@kde.org wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
>
>
Bertil Rolf
Baden bei Wien
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
this helps.
Best regards
Bertil Rolf,
Baden bei Wien
PS. I will transfer a zipfile (53 MB) with 9 photo files one way or another.
Here a link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12_q0RMDsMn1QWiJSvl1Dft8FRPXVfh6a/view?usp=drive_link
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: W11
Linux/KDE Plasma: 8.5.0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493838
Bertil Rolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b.g.r...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #9 from Bertil Rolf ---
Hello,
Will try out this in a couple of days.
Btw, like 8.6.0. a lot!
Best
Bertil Rolf
On 2025-04-11 20:13, bugzilla_nore...@kde.org wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
>
> --- Commen
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #11 from Bertil Rolf ---
Hello!
I now have tried out DNG-conversion from CR2 to DNG, using DigiKam
8.7.0. on Windows 11 and using Adobe DNG Converter for comparison.
Photos and comments enclosed here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #13 from Bertil Rolf ---
Hello,
You are right, the image quality of Adobe Converter and DigiKam is
roughly equivalent. I fed the same CR2 files into both apps without much
thought.
Except for file size, there is a very significant
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #15 from Bertil Rolf ---
About the speed of Adobe conversion, I can only say it is impressive,
not how it is attained.
Thanks for the hint about BQM.
For an advanced amateur like me, the greatest advantage DigiKam has over
Lightroom are
15 matches
Mail list logo
