https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
Andreas Arnez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
Andreas Arnez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #125487|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
Test with the revised patch look good. There are a couple of failures, but none
seem related to this issue:
== 746 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0
stdoutB failures, 2 post failure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 125541
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=125541&action=edit
updated patch with IROp cmp_op argument for s390_irgen_CxB ()
Testing this updated patch that adds an IrOp cmp_op argument t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #4)
> I tried the patch on koji (remote builder) on Fedora rawhide with GCC10. It
> seems to cause:
>
> op name: CmpF32
> op type is (F32,F32) -> I32
> arg tys are (F64,F64
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
Andreas Arnez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|jsew...@acm.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Arnez ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #1)
> Andreas, given that newer GCC and LLVM do emit these now, it sounds like
> supporting them is potentially of high priority. What's your view?
Absolutely. I have a patc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416301
--- Comment #1 from Julian Seward ---
Andreas, given that newer GCC and LLVM do emit these now, it sounds like
supporting them is potentially of high priority. What's your view?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes
