[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2020-11-25 Thread Uwe Stöhr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #10 from Uwe Stöhr --- Thus bug is still in Okular 1.11. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-08-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #9 from Uwe Stöhr --- Dear Albert, you got me wrong. I was just reporting all bugs with my first trials with Okular. I did not sort for severe and cosmetic bugs. My reports were also not meant to force you to have a look at them right now.

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-31 Thread Albert Astals Cid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #8 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Oliver Sander from comment #7) > Hmm, unfortunately Uwe is correct, and legally one line is enough. That is true and not true at the same time, you don't have to list people on the UI, you have to

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-31 Thread Oliver Sander
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander --- Hmm, unfortunately Uwe is correct, and legally one line is enough. A tentative git log --pretty=format:"%an" generators/poppler | sort | uniq gives me 53 names, though... -- You are receiving this mail because:

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #6 from Uwe Stöhr --- > should people that contributed 1 line be listed in the same place that people > that contributed 100. Unfortunately, legally spoken, yes. One line is enough to claim the same rights. That is why we list in LyX e

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-30 Thread Oliver Sander
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander --- Well. In that case, why not simply remove those 'About backend' dialogs, and have one copyright list for all of okular only? That would not solve your fundamental question, but it would make it easier. -- You ar

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #4 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Oliver Sander from comment #3) > I agree with Uwe: it is very minor, but it is a bug. Albert, I will prepare > a patch if you tell me who is to be listed in that 'About' dialog. > Everybody who cha

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-30 Thread Oliver Sander
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-29 Thread Uwe Stöhr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 --- Comment #2 from Uwe Stöhr --- > We can either fix that or spend time on bugs, you decide ;) I am confused. Usually developers like feedback. Personally for me every feedback is welcome, no matter if users report severe things or cosmetic ones. --

[okular] [Bug 382864] wrong info about PDF backend

2017-07-29 Thread Albert Astals Cid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382864 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aa...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Albert As