[marble] [Bug 381872] Crash when adding bookmark with UTM view angle

2017-07-06 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381872 --- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Bauer --- I agree, that's better indeed. ;-) And I can confirm that the crash is fixed. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[marble] [Bug 381872] Crash when adding bookmark with UTM view angle

2017-07-06 Thread Mohammed Nafees
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381872 Mohammed Nafees changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit|https://commits.kde.org/mar |https://commits.kde.org/mar

[marble] [Bug 381872] Crash when adding bookmark with UTM view angle

2017-07-06 Thread Mohammed Nafees
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381872 Mohammed Nafees changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Latest Commit|

[marble] [Bug 381872] Crash when adding bookmark with UTM view angle

2017-07-05 Thread Dennis Nienhüser
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381872 Dennis Nienhüser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nienhue...@kde.org Status|UNCONF

[marble] [Bug 381872] Crash when adding bookmark with UTM view angle

2017-07-04 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381872 --- Comment #2 from Wolfgang Bauer --- PS, The crash got "introduced" by this change: https://cgit.kde.org/marble.git/commit/?id=7859bf1cc1fdaf07b70446b1530358bff7bf43e3 I'd suggest to revert this (even in the 17.04 branch) until it's implemented prope

[marble] [Bug 381872] Crash when adding bookmark with UTM view angle

2017-07-01 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381872 Wolfgang Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://bugzilla.opensuse.or

[marble] [Bug 381872] Crash when adding bookmark with UTM view angle

2017-07-01 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381872 --- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Bauer --- This has also been reported in openSUSE's bugzilla: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1044747 The problem seems to be that there is no input handler implemented yet for the UTM case. According to the ba