https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #29 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
There is already too much hate on internet and I hope that we can forget this
and make peace.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #28 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
Wow I said I was sorry to reopen the bug report, just said to you to speak to
me better and I didn't wanted to enter in your game without arguing and you say
I'm trolling, you must be crazy...
It's weird to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Lübking ---
ok, sorry i missed that you're just trolling. thanks for wasting my time and
welcome to my sa blacklist.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #26 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #25)
If you don't understand what I meant you can reread the comments. I don't want
to spend more time on this, so can we stop with this and move along please ? I
thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #25 from Thomas Lübking ---
So you just claim I spoke "badly" and demand to stop that but refuse to explain
why you feel offended by stating some simple facts?
If you want something, specify it and don't avoid simple answers. Otherwise you
r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #24 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I don't want to argue with you. If you don't see that you talk badly to me I
can't help.
> try to not stir up my anger.
You are getting upset alone I'm afraid...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Lübking ---
Like "what"?
Telling you that your wish is "wrong" (as had been explained several times
before), asking to stop "pointless" insinuations or clarifying what denying
this wish implies and what not?
If you should ha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #22 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #21)
OK sorry but, and I will say it only once, stop talking to me like this please.
I just hope that something more user friendly than a script will be done to
impr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Lübking ---
This has *nothing* to do with "user friendlyness" - so stop such insinuations,
they won't get your anywhere you want.
You asked for an approach that is plain wrong (to avoid harsher judgements), so
it won't happe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #20 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
It's sad that Linux can't be more user friendly...
Like I said :
> Do you really think that a simple user that just want to watch some videos or
> play a game in good conditions will think that there is a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
Thomas Lübking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
jeremy9...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #18 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I knew that scripts exist for kwin but I didn't even think to look at them. I
thought (and still think) that was a feature for really specific and advanced
things like "video wall". For that particular and so
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Lübking ---
That probably means we've to tell the HIG team that their efforts to stash the
compositing kcm from end users failed miserably ;-P
On the bottom line, you say "kwin has this nice and powerful scripting system,
bu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #16 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
> What exactly is your exact concern about using the script system which was
> especially created to allow flexible and custom manipulation of the flow
> control in kwin?
I don't have any concern about usi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Lübking ---
Which is not part of the rule system (as your request initially pointed) and
totally broken/useless to begin with (because it doesn't cover unmanaged
windows which many games actually are while otoh, you usually d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #14 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I really don't understand. You already do some kind of detection for the
"unredirected fullscreen window" feature...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Lübking ---
As suggested before: matching the fullscreen state in the rules is not only
irregular (the matching applies to static attributes, we made an exception for
the title due to popular client "bugs" which change them t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #12 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #11)
> To gain less flexibility?
Why ? Having a fullscreen matching feature built in Kwin don't avoid the
possible use of the script it one need it ?
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Lübking ---
To gain less flexibility?
Despite Martins concern, the scripting overhead is neglectable - switching
fullscreen state doesn't happen that often (and far more expensive things than
a string comparism happen in that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #10 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
What I mean is that it should be a built in feature of Kwin ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Lübking ---
Please notice that there's nothing such as a buil-in script, it's only a matter
of distribution policy.
Whether your distro installs the script with kwin, in a side package or you
fetch it from the GHNS servers mak
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #8 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Martin Gräßlin from comment #6)
> rules on fullscreen seem wrong to me as that is kind of the dynamic
> adjustment what scripts are about. In fact the motivation seems to be about
> games and for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Lübking ---
(In reply to Martin Gräßlin from comment #6)
> I'm not sure about it as it introduces string comparisons for all windows at
> all time.
If QtScript isn't totally broken: only on fullscreen state changes ;-)
> I'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
Martin Gräßlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #5 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I didn't know that ^_^
Great work thanks !
Obviously, you like/need this feature so do you think we can implement
something similar in Kwin ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Lübking ---
"Some people" actually happens to be "me" :-P
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #3 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
The script seems to do what I mean but it could be better to have it integrated
in Kwin don't you think since some people have gone as far as created a
specialized script ?
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #2 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
It can be useful for video playback for exemple and probably other use case.
When the video player is in windowed mode you may want compositing but when you
switch in fullscreen or when you launch it directl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
Thomas Lübking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Lübking -
30 matches
Mail list logo
