https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
--- Comment #7 from Bug Janitor Service ---
Dear Bug Submitter,
This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least
15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
Justin Zobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
--- Comment #5 from Michael Brewer ---
(In reply to Michael Brewer from comment #4)
> From your previous comment, I got the impression that INDEX was something
> specific to the plot. If INDEX is in fact just another 1 sample per frame
> vector, then I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
--- Comment #4 from Michael Brewer ---
>From your previous comment, I got the impression that INDEX was something
specific to the plot. If INDEX is in fact just another 1 sample per frame
vector, then I agree that it should be the same as all the other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
--- Comment #3 from netterfi...@astro.utoronto.ca ---
On February 25, 2016 01:06:06 PM you wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
>
> --- Comment #2 from Michael Brewer ---
> Following this logic, if my data set consisted of less than 201
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
--- Comment #2 from Michael Brewer ---
Following this logic, if my data set consisted of less than 201 samples, KST
would display nothing. In my opinion, the INDEX vector should always extend to
one point beyond the number of frames (or partial frames)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352367
netterfi...@astro.utoronto.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||netterfield@astro.utoronto.
