https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Leupold ---
Even nicer ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #14 from andreas.sturmlech...@gmail.com ---
Fix was(In reply to Tobias Leupold from comment #9)
> Perhaps, we can add a 4.5-r1 ebuild for Gentoo including the (surprisingly
> small) patch so that you can remove the hard mask?
Patch was added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #13 from andreas.sturmlech...@gmail.com ---
Indeed, merged fine, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
Johannes Zarl-Zierl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #10 from Johannes Zarl-Zierl ---
Tobias: thanks for testing. I'll merge it to master later today...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #11 from Johannes Zarl-Zierl ---
Tobias: thanks for testing. I'll merge it to master later today...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Leupold ---
Johannes pushed a branch fixing the compilation that – on Gentoo – works fine
both with exiv2-0.26 and 0.27. Perhaps, we can add a 4.5-r1 ebuild for Gentoo
including the (surprisingly small) patch so that you can r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #8 from andreas.sturmlech...@gmail.com ---
For similar fix in gwenview wrt autoPtr, see also:
https://phabricator.kde.org/D17872
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Leupold ---
Okay, with the blessings of a Gentoo dev (obviously), I'm out of excuses now
;-) I'll try it asap!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #6 from Johannes Zarl-Zierl ---
Now if *that* isn't a good motivation ;-)
I have started a feature branch for it, but the system installation of Exiv2
0.25 interferes with my local installation. I'm tired now - I'll debug my build
problems t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #5 from andreas.sturmlech...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Tobias Leupold from comment #4)
> and here on Gentoo, it's there but hard masked. As soon as we can install it
> without f**ing up our system, we will port the codebase ;-)
You are very
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
Tobias Leupold changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobias.leup...@gmx.de
--- Comment #4 from Tobi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #3 from andreas.sturmlech...@gmail.com ---
Yes, I'm aware of that. ;) Basically exiv2-0.27 support is already done in most
kde.org packages depending on it (in progress with libkexiv2), porting was easy
in most of them. We should make sure kp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
Johannes Zarl-Zierl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402564
--- Comment #1 from andreas.sturmlech...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 117106
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=117106&action=edit
build.log
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.2.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
CMakeFiles/kphotoal
16 matches
Mail list logo
