https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Baumgart ---
No, unfortunately it is not that easy. Additional code needs to be written in
an area that is not maintained anymore. Means, I am currently planning to
rewrite it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401
--- Comment #10 from harry bennett ---
Are you implying that it may be as simple as just 'enabling' it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Baumgart ---
The underlying storage design allows a "payee per split" but it is currently
not used by the application (split transaction editor).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
Interestingly I just ran into this - I had made a deposit earlier in the year,
including checks I received from three different sources. I had a great deal
of trouble finding that transaction, since searching by payee obvio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401
Christian David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401
--- Comment #6 from harry bennett ---
FYI: I changed the heading on the bug to better reflect what I mean
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342401
harry bennett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|allow splits on payees |allow different payees on
|