[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2023-11-08 Thread Gabriel Barrantes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 Gabriel Barrantes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2023-02-04 Thread Syam
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 --- Comment #10 from Syam --- There's definitely a bug here. Test case: In 'numeral system mode', select 'Bin' for binary. Try pasting a string like "5". It fails with 'nan'. This indicates that the pasted number is expected to be in binary. In that c

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2023-02-02 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 --- Comment #9 from guimarcalsi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Evan Teran from comment #3) > Yea, this one is tough because I can see both implementations as being > reasonable. As a programmer, I would expect a value of 0777 to be > interpreted as octal

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2023-02-02 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 guimarcalsi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2019-07-29 Thread Christoph Feck
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 Christoph Feck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trufano...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Chris

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2019-04-28 Thread Christoph Feck
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 Christoph Feck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||get.so...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Christ

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2019-03-11 Thread Andrew Crouthamel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 Andrew Crouthamel changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2019-02-12 Thread Julian Schraner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 Julian Schraner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@xyquadrat.ch --- Comment #5 from Julian

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2017-07-17 Thread martonmiklos
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 martonmiklos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martonmiklosq...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from m

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2017-01-30 Thread Evan Teran
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 --- Comment #3 from Evan Teran --- Yea, this one is tough because I can see both implementations as being reasonable. As a programmer, I would expect a value of 0777 to be interpreted as octal no matter what ... because it is an octal number by conventi

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2017-01-30 Thread Christoph Feck
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 Christoph Feck changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal -- You are receiving this mail because

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2017-01-30 Thread radius . soukroma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 --- Comment #2 from radius.soukr...@gmail.com --- Hi, thanks for answer, but it is really bad behavior. I have tested windows calc -GOOD and galculator - GOOD (Are anothers? Will test them, find only 2 with this functionality). If I'm in binary mode, al

[kcalc] [Bug 375681] Not correctly handle binary numbers

2017-01-29 Thread Evan Teran
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375681 --- Comment #1 from Evan Teran --- So, the issue here is that the number is being interpreted as Octal due to the string format. Typical conventions (that are used by kcalc) echo those of programming languages. Which are that numbers which start with "