[digikam] [Bug 430251] suggestions to improve face detection workflow

2024-10-07 Thread Michael Miller
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430251 --- Comment #5 from Michael Miller --- Hi Chris, Yes. Scanning a RAW file, and your case a .CR2 will take longer because we have to convert the RAW to jpeg for face recognition. The issue is that the JPEG image may or may not be exactly the same size a

[digikam] [Bug 430251] suggestions to improve face detection workflow

2024-10-07 Thread Chris Thieme
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430251 --- Comment #4 from Chris Thieme --- In my experience, the scanning time for CR2 files was considerably longer than for jpg files. Hence my suggestion to reuse the detected face tags from the jpgs for the raw images. I completely agree that grouping ot

[digikam] [Bug 430251] suggestions to improve face detection workflow

2024-10-07 Thread Michael Miller
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430251 --- Comment #3 from Michael Miller --- Hi Gilles, I agree with @Maik that this request is problematic. I think the correct solution is to make face detection and recognition faster for each image individually. Using other images to try to identify fa

[digikam] [Bug 430251] suggestions to improve face detection workflow

2024-10-07 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430251 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael_mil...@msn.com --- Comment #2

[digikam] [Bug 430251] suggestions to improve face detection workflow

2020-12-11 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430251 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Faces-Detection |Faces-Workflow CC|

[digikam] [Bug 430251] suggestions to improve face detection workflow

2020-12-11 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430251 Maik Qualmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||metzping...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Maik