https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
--- Comment #5 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam 7.0.0 stable release is now published:
https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-07-19-7.0.0_release_announcement/
We need a fresh feedback on this file using this version.
Best Regards
Gilles Caulier
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.2.0 |7.0.0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
--- Comment #4 from Octopuss ---
Hello,
I've checked digikam-7.0.0-beta1-x86-64.appimage from 2019-12-22.
The problem is still here.
I've got a RAW file and open it in darktable(2.6.3) - lens correction module
shows the correct lens (Cannon, Canon...
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
--- Comment #3 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam 7.0.0-beta1 is out :
https://download.kde.org/unstable/digikam/
This problem still reproducible with this version which include Libraw engine
version 0.20.0 ?
Thanks in advance and merry Christm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
--- Comment #2 from Octopuss ---
Hi,
Sorry for delay. I can add an example RAW(CR2) and the resulting DNG with the
issue.
CR2: https://www.dropbox.com/s/y647nngjsonim5h/IMG_6963.CR2?dl=0
DNG: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ximzsacv82g9nz2/IMG_6963.dng?dl=0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
--- Comment #1 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
The Lens description is given from Exiv2 from markernotes decoding. The
markenotes from Canon is copied as well in DNG, but for obscur reasons, Exiv2
do not decode this as with CR2 file.
I recommend to as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com
Com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381967
Octopuss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |openSUSE RPMs
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
