https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364790
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364790
--- Comment #5 from DrSlony ---
Thank you for taking this. As I build from git I can test as soon as its
committed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364790
--- Comment #4 from Maik Qualmann ---
The current 100% view has the advantage when a user, for example, a RAW and
JPEG image from the camera and a developed PNG image in 100% viewed. When
switching between these images, the image size and position remai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364790
--- Comment #3 from DrSlony ---
"Yes, the 100% always refer to the original size of the image."
This is a bad design choice, and I will explain why.
When stretching the embedded JPEG preview to the reported raw size, digiKam's
preview is always blurry,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364790
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Maik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364790
--- Comment #1 from DrSlony ---
Unusable 100% preview in digiKam looks like this:
https://i.imgur.com/zO0owHz.jpg
Today's master,
http://commits.kde.org/digikam/543a36a75162ce8bc23c3c06d7cbd91ecf35f244
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364790
DrSlony changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@londonlight.org
--
You are receiving this mail
