https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374
Sergio Martins changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374
--- Comment #2 from Volker Krause ---
I haven't found a valid use of left(1) yet, so an unconditional warning would
probably be fine. In theory it differs from at(0) in that it returns a QString
rather than a QChar, which doesn't matter for string conca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Martins ---
When shouldn't QString::left(1) be replaced by at(0) ?
Wondering if we should just warn for all occurrences.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374
Sergio Martins changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned-b...@kde.org |smart...@kde.org
Status|UNCONFIRME
