[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2018-02-12 Thread Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 Paul changed: What|Removed |Added CC|pip@gmx.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watchi

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-29 Thread Ivan Čukić
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 Ivan Čukić changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #14 from Paul --- As I said, go for it guys. :) It's all now rather moot as far as I'm concerned. My data, my choice, my risk assessment. Vault is not an application that I foresee myself using. -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #15 from Nate Graham --- That's just fine! Vault isn't targeting users like you, who are likely to be able to easily roll your own solution that perfectly fits your needs (I did the same before Vault came along). -- You are receiving this

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #13 from cryptod...@libertymail.net --- > Isn't that removing user choice Yes, you don't allow your user to pick an option that is _known_ to put them at risk. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #12 from Paul --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #9) > use CryFS instead Isn't that removing user choice also... The flaws with encfs are known, CryFS is not mature and an unknown quantity at this point. (Yes, I am aware of https://

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #11 from Paul --- Go for it guys :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #10 from cryptod...@libertymail.net --- > I think the user does have a choice: use CryFS instead, and then the location > can be safely specified, no? Nate has it right, since CryFS doesn't have the security issues there are no restrictions

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #9 from Nate Graham --- I think the user does have a choice: use CryFS instead, and then the location can be safely specified, no? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #8 from Paul --- If I'm reading your patch correctly... When using encfs you are now enforcing the location of the encrypted data. >Only when the user picks EncFS we then continue to not allow the user to >pick his 'device' directory where

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #7 from cryptod...@libertymail.net --- > I would not approve a patch that changes the location to XDG_DATA_HOME as > this is not application data - this is user data. The XDG_DATA_DIR is specified as; "the base directory relative to which

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-25 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #6 from cryptod...@libertymail.net --- Patch available: https://phabricator.kde.org/D8469 It just uses the XDG_DATA_DIR to calculate the default directory for the encrypted data. The stuff the user actually interacts with is still set at ~/

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-24 Thread Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #5 from Paul --- (In reply to Ivan Čukić from comment #4) > You can choose the exact location for both the encrypted data and the mount > point for each of the vaults you create. Yes, I was aware of that. That is currently what I'm doing :

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #4 from Ivan Čukić --- You can choose the exact location for both the encrypted data and the mount point for each of the vaults you create. I would +1 a patch which allows configuring the default prefix for both. I would not approve a patch

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-21 Thread Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 Paul changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pip@gmx.com --- Comment #3 from Paul --- (In reply

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-20 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 --- Comment #2 from Nate Graham --- Cryptodude, would you like to submit a patch for this on phabricator.kde.org? If you've never done it before, I can help guide you through the process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bu

[Plasma Vault] [Bug 385982] Please use XDG spec for dirs

2017-10-20 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385982 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com --- Comment #1 from Nate Gr