https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|katyaberezy...@gmail.com|
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are wa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Snap|Flatpak
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Snap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||onlineplayer...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleix...@kde.org
Severity|normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Alex changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alex...@protonmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
--- Comment #6 from Harald Sitter ---
(In reply to Aleix Pol from comment #5)
> All packagekit packages are offline?
Really long term yes. Yes.
Perhaps somewhat less long term: anything that is not associated with an
application component in appstream
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
--- Comment #5 from Aleix Pol ---
@Harald If this is a transient thing, what would the end-goal be?
All packagekit packages are offline?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
--- Comment #4 from Harald Sitter ---
@Neal this is a transient thing. the long term goal is to have offline updates
enabled for "some" parts of the system (the some part being real long term
anything that is not a bundle IMO). However, before we go the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Fabian Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fab...@ritter-vogt.de
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Also, to the idea of a package whitelist, that's absolutely bonkers. I don't
know how that would reasonably scale. And how do you deal with virtual
packages, renames, splits, etc?
It's too cumbersome. It's better to u
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
--- Comment #1 from Aleix Pol ---
How would you have this work?
Could you tell me what kind of whitelist you have in mind for e.g. Neon?
Also feedback on how this should work for Fedora/Suse would be useful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399371
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org
--
You are receiving this mail beca
16 matches
Mail list logo
