Re: Konqueror 5.0.97 issues

2018-06-18 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Monday June 18 2018 10:57:31 Jerome Yuzyk wrote: >best part was (and perhaps still is) that I can open them at will and they're >all independent processes and one instance crashing or locking up matters >nothing to all the others. I can't say the same for Firefox, or Chrome, or >SeaMonkey -

Re: Konqueror 5.0.97 issues

2018-06-18 Thread Jerome Yuzyk
On Monday, June 18, 2018 3:34:24 AM MDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Monday June 18 2018 07:25:30 Duncan wrote: > >FWIW I left konqueror behind back in the kde4 era, when it became very > >evident that it wasn't getting timely security-fix releases suitable to > >usage for online banking, etc. > >

Re: Konqueror 5.0.97 issues

2018-06-18 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Monday June 18 2018 07:25:30 Duncan wrote: >FWIW I left konqueror behind back in the kde4 era, when it became very >evident that it wasn't getting timely security-fix releases suitable to >usage for online banking, etc. This may or may not have improved, because in the end Konqueror uses Qt

Re: Konqueror 5.0.97 issues

2018-06-18 Thread Duncan
Jerome Yuzyk posted on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 11:34:00 -0600 as excerpted: > [Konqueror 5.0.97 on Fedora 28 updated just this morning] > > Because of a disk crash I had to replace my /dev/sda which previously > had Fedora 25 on it. Fortunately I keep /home on /dev/sdb so I installed > Fedora 28 on a ne