Revision: 6615
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/6615
Author: ma15569
Date: 2020-10-27 12:37:37 + (Tue, 27 Oct 2020)
Log Message:
---
changed method to avoid exception
Modified Paths:
--
plug-ins/CADExtension/trunk/src/org/openjump/advancedtools/
Peppe,
could you reproduce the issue on your side? i could, but weird thing is, it
complains about a missing method that is definitely there. are you compiling
against the latest OJ-Core?
..ede
On 10/27/2020 13:37, jump-pilot-svn--- via Jump-pilot-devel wrote:
> Revision: 6615
> http
Revision: 6616
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/6616
Author: ma15569
Date: 2020-10-27 12:46:58 + (Tue, 27 Oct 2020)
Log Message:
---
removed cadtools 1.0a
Removed Paths:
-
core/trunk/lib/plus/CadTools-1.0a.jar
Deleted: core/trunk/lib/plus/CadToo
Revision: 6617
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/6617
Author: ma15569
Date: 2020-10-27 12:47:46 + (Tue, 27 Oct 2020)
Log Message:
---
added cadtools ver 1.0b
Added Paths:
---
core/trunk/lib/plus/CadTools-1.0b.jar
Added: core/trunk/lib/plus/CadTools-1
Yes.
The problem is on line
ClassLoader classLoader =
context.getWorkbench().getPlugInManager().getClassLoader();
After searching in the code I changed it with the method
ClassLoader classLoader = context.getWorkbench()
.getPlugInManager().getPlugInClassLoader()
and it seems to work fine (see OJ
works again. i'm wondering where this CAD specific python console can be
activated?
also. why does it exist in parallel to the normal one and why does it need to
be initialized with totally different code? ..ede
On 10/27/2020 13:52, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> Yes.
> The problem is on line
> ClassL
The idea is to migrate python consolle into CAD toolbox. The advantage is
to group all together some useful tools that are available on the python
console (like align and distribute tools, see Cad toolbox bar).
A further step is to activate a python console itself and make it more
evident, via Ca
but why doesn't it just simply reuse the existing python console? it has access
to all the same functionality! ..ede
On 10/27/2020 14:55, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> The idea is to migrate python consolle into CAD toolbox. The advantage is to
> group all together some useful tools that are available
hey Roberto,
this seems to fall through the cracks ;(. please try and report on the
following when you find the time
> additionally please try your routine with r6564+ but instead of Sextante
> image use the "Open->File->(Select your tifs, click Next)->(keep Use same
> settings for *.tif enabl
After Roberto's video I was able to reproduce the bug. I had to load 39 (!)
raster layers together the huge shapefiles (I used the same rasters that
Roberto kindly provided) before I had that spagetti shape raster our. I have no
idea about the reason of it. I can image it could be related to th
let's wait how the evaluation turns out.. ede
On 27.10.2020 20:53, giuseppe.ar...@gmail.com wrote:
> So it would be better to compare it with also Image-io (ext) speed, memory
> usage and performance
>
> --
> Inviato da myMail per Android
>
> martedì, 27 ottobre 2020, 08:32PM +01:00 da edgar.sol.
Sorry Ede,
You mean I should repeat the test using Open->File- using Buffered Image
(Commons Imaging)?
I tried that.
It's much more faster, but, after having loaded the "raster pack", "Java
heap space" appears.
The rasters are correctly displayed.
Roberto
Il 27/10/2020 19:15, edgar.sol...@w
Hi,Thanks for the video. I also could reroduce the problem.I reduced the test to its minimum by setting -Xmx100M and trying to load the hillshade tif alone.Surprinsingly, the problem occurs when used memory is about half of the available memory.By chance, I found some code in RasterImageLayer whi
13 matches
Mail list logo
