Hi,
The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the
ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not
possible at the moment:
While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that
username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity
jump-pilot
or
openjump-pilot
or
openjump2
2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric :
> Hi,
>
> The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the
> ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not
> possible at the moment:
>
>> While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won'
oj-devs
oj-developers
oj-team
or jump instead of oj
so many possibilieits ..ede:))
On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> jump-pilot
> or
> openjump-pilot
> or
> openjump2
>
> 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric :
>> Hi,
>>
>> The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the
well then
https://github.com/openjump-gis
it is. i can live with that.. ede
On 14.08.2020 11:27, GitHub wrote:
> Hi edeso,
>
>
>
> @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization on GitHub.
> Head over to https://github.com/openjump-gis to check out @openjump-gis’s
> profile
openjump-gis ok for me too
2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de :
> oj-devs
> oj-developers
> oj-team
> or jump instead of oj
>
> so many possibilieits ..ede:))
>
> On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
>> jump-pilot
>> or
>> openjump-pilot
>> or
>> openjump2
>>
>> 2020-08-14 11:50
As I previously wrote, I just created it for the time being based on the
openjump.org website title (I have personally no preference). It was
just to start working on it and it can be changed at any time.
Ede, as owner of this organisation, you can do it. Feel absolutely free
to do so.
Eric
Eric, thanks. as stated, for the time being it's as good as any other name. if
someone objects that might change but my bet is you just settled it on the
first try :) ..ede
On 14.08.2020 12:18, Eric wrote:
> As I previously wrote, I just created it for the time being based on the
> openjump.org
Hi Eric and others,
Thank you very much for the work that you have done with preparing the
migration into new JTS version. That will help to keep the project alive and I
suppose that move to GitHub supports that as well.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
github: jratike80
___
Eric, any idea where the 'OpeenJUMP' note the double e stems from? ..ede
On 14.08.2020 12:29, OpeenJUMP wrote:
> You have been granted admin access to OpeenJUMP. Admins have full rights to
> the organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams.
>
> View all OpeenJUMP admins:
>
I saw that too. It has already been corrected. Logo and URL added as well.
And I don't know why you didn't have been granted the owner role
straight away as I invited you as owner and not member. That's why I had
to change your role to correct it.
Please let me know if you see anything else,
just added minor clarification to the repo title. apart from that go ahead :)
and don't forget to drink plenty if you are on this planets summer side ;)
On 14.08.2020 12:44, Eric wrote:
> I saw that too. It has already been corrected. Logo and URL added as well.
>
> And I don't know why you didn'
No risk to be dehydrated in Scotland (at least for the time being).
16°C right now with an anticipated peak at 18°C at 5-6pm. Same kind of
temperatures until the end of this month.
Eric
On 14/08/2020 11:50, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
just added minor clarification to the repo title. apart fr
Good start, thank you, Eric,Michaëlenvoyé : 14 août 2020 à 12:18de : Eric à : jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.netobjet : Re: [JPP-Devel] [GitHub] @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organizationAs I previously wrote, I just created it for the time being based on the openjump.
If the problem is between 1.15 and r6370 (title is about 1.15 while report is
about 1.5 which seems very old!), I can still not reproduce it. I now tried
between 1.15 (r6241), r6335 and r6370, with windows and with linux (windows +
wsl/ubuntu).
Comparing jmp files, I noticed a small difference
Hi Michael, can you send me the files you used as first test? I will try on my
side
---
** [bugs:#496] OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing
versions**
**Status:** open
**Created:** Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC by ede
**Last Updated:** Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:19 PM UTC
**
The second test I made is much better. I used your files, but I deleted jmp
files and restarted from scratch :
- load tiff as raster, tiff as image, jml + style in 1.15, save as 1.15.jmp
- load tiff as raster, tiff as image, jml + style in 6370, save as 6370.jmp
Try to load 1.15.jmp from 6370 and
Hi,
I'm encountering a problem during the local migration (ra_serf: The
server sent a truncated HTTP response body) when I try to do it from
revision 859 to revision 6242.
I tried to exclude the 'docs' folder to reduce the size of it, without
much success (still the same error after an hour
probably just sf.net's svn acting up. it sometimes throws weird errors that
resolve itself after a time. i guess they get fixed on their servers. who knows.
anyway. what is it you are doing when it errs out? a complete checkout? what
commands are you running? can you give some context?
..ede
O
The command is to migrate the complete project, including its history,
from svn to git:
svn2git https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/core --exclude docs
--revision 859:6242 --authors ../authors.txt
I first tried without excluding the docs folder. The revision parameters
match the first an
some more questions
1. did it ever run through completely?
2. why start at revision 859?
3. did you try https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git#debugging ?
it'd probably more stable if you could work with a full local checkout.. ede
On 14.08.2020 21:26, Eric wrote:
> The command is to migrate the c
See my inline answers below.
On 14/08/2020 20:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
some more questions
1. did it ever run through completely?
During my first tests, I used a starting revision number closer to 6242
to test the process and to save some time (as I knew it would take ages
to go throu
The use of the ra_svn module rather than the ra_serf one seems to be a
rather good approach.
The migration process worked well during the last 2 and a half hours. It
already took into account all the branches, and partially the trunk and
the tags from 1.2preC to 1.7.0.
I'll let you know abou
22 matches
Mail list logo
