Hi Peppe,
Just wonder why you want to retrieve authorities from srid ?
If it is important, why not adding authority in the srid.txt file ?
It is quite impossible to get authority from code as codes are supposed
to be unique for a single authority only.
By chance, EPSG is so well-known that most
Revision: 5006
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5006
Author: michaudm
Date: 2016-09-04 10:56:33 + (Sun, 04 Sep 2016)
Log Message:
---
Fix some strange characters used to define IGNF CRS in srid.txt
Modified Paths:
--
core/trunk/src/org/openjump/c
Revision: 5007
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5007
Author: michaudm
Date: 2016-09-04 10:57:18 + (Sun, 04 Sep 2016)
Log Message:
---
Create a specific class to read and lookup into srid.txt file
Added Paths:
---
core/trunk/src/org/openjump/core/ccor
Hi Michaël
thanks for the explanation. It was a bit confusing (not only for me) when
studing this topic
EPS codes
http://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html
reading this page it seems that EPSG code range are:
0 - 32767 and 6,000,000 - 6,999,999 (since ver. 6.6)
Hi Peppe,
Thanks for your new explanations and references,
For EPSG codes from 6,000,000 - 6,999,999 : I finally agree with you.
These codes are deprecated but "remain in EPSG dataset".
Michaël
Le 04/09/2016 à 16:11, Giuseppe Aruta a écrit :
Hi Michaël
thanks for the explanation. It was a
... is someone of you a member of this mail list: disc...@lists.osgeo.org
Last week we discussed a solution of a central web-database where all
coordinate systems are registered. This database should be promoted by OSGeo.
Maybe i can send you the mail traffic?
Best regards,
Manfred
-Origi
Revision: 5008
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5008
Author: michaudm
Date: 2016-09-04 17:01:18 + (Sun, 04 Sep 2016)
Log Message:
---
ProjUtils2, a refactoring of ProjUtil (work on progress)
Added Paths:
---
core/trunk/src/org/openjump/core/ccordsys/
Peppe,
I committed a new version of ProjUtils (ProjUtils2).
The code is not tested and not yet active. Let me know if you think we
can go on this way (I may have broken some tests in my willing to simplify).
If you're OK with proposed changes, I think we can go a step further :
- GeoTiffEnvelo
Hi manfred,
Can you give us a reference to this discussion ?
Will this database have a distinct goal compared with
http://spatialreference.org/ ?
Michaël
Le 04/09/2016 à 18:59, manf...@egger-gis.at a écrit :
> ... is someone of you a member of this mail list: disc...@lists.osgeo.org
>
> Last
A few comments:
Discussion is in thread
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-August/thread.html#16505
"Detect and define the coordinate system of gis data with no projection
information automatically".
This discussion mentions epsg.io and spatialreference.org and why the latter is
... please look also at September:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-September/thread.html
Please tell me if this discussion is important for you or you have an good
idea. I saw in your mails that you also try to unify coordinate system
defintions.
Best regards,
Manfred
---Origin
11 matches
Mail list logo
