Re: [JPP-Devel] R: cts 0.2 stable & geomconv 0.3rc2 released

2011-06-29 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, >> - good work for multilinestring to polygon (with holes) conversion >> You did not deal with the case of multilinestring to be converted into >> multipolygon. It is tricky as there is no way to be 100% sure that a >> linearing is an inner ring or an outer ring. >> If you're interested I ma

Re: [JPP-Devel] R: geometry converter 0.3rc3

2011-06-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.06.2011 07:38, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Points of LinearRing do not form a closed linestring > this is directly generated in jts linearring code com vividsolutions jts geom LinearRing.java 105: throw new IllegalArgumentException("Points of LinearRing do not form a closed linestring"); ple

Re: [JPP-Devel] R: cts 0.2 stable & geomconv 0.3rc2 released

2011-06-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.06.2011 09:11, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Right, that works... but sometimes it doen't. I cannot understand why > one of these multilinestring is converted into multipolygon and not the > other (anyway, I checked the spec and it seems that none of them isValid) : > > MULTILINESTRING ((139 22

[JPP-Devel] New realize of OpenJUMP JUFRE 0.3

2011-06-29 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi all this is a new version of OpenJUMP Jufre version 0.3. The software is based on OpenJUMP 1.4 with more improvements. - OpenJUMP Jufre 0.3 can be downloaded here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/opensit/files/Openjump/Jufre/jufre-1.3.zip/download - This is the source code of the core softwar

[JPP-Devel] geometry converter 0.3rc4 released

2011-06-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.06.2011 07:38, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > - if I have a multipoint and I transform it to other multigeometry: > (multipoint, multilinestring, multipolygon). The geometry disappears on the > workbench. If I chech on the table view, I can find that there is a > "MULTIPOINT EMPTY". fixes the ab

Re: [JPP-Devel] New realize of OpenJUMP JUFRE 0.3

2011-06-29 Thread Martin Davis
Giuseppe, Wow! That's a great list of changes. Based on a quick read of the doc, it looks like some great ideas in there. I'm excited to see so much activity on JUMP - the app is really moving forward now! Martin On 6/29/2011 4:05 AM, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi all > this is a new version o