Le 24/06/2011 11:15, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
peppe votes to have the geometry conversion also in the layerview context menu.
as i do not work with gis i don't know how often one needs this functonality.
so i put that up for voting. anybody else in favor or against it?
@michael: your vote
Hi all,
few considerations
> 1) It took me some times to understand the differences with
> existing tools like extract points
That's why I think that it should be better into Edit menu on toolbar. Anyhow
the LayerContext menu will be more acxtractive
> 2) If no feature is selected, th
i see there are multipolygon and such geometries (multi*s). would it make sense
to support a conversion into those?
how is the multi* support in oj? as far as i can see features support on
geometry only. is multi* the workaround for that? how are multi*s saved?
ede
Hi Ede,
Le 25/06/2011 13:28, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
> i see there are multipolygon and such geometries (multi*s). would it make
> sense to support a conversion into those?
>
> how is the multi* support in oj? as far as i can see features support on
> geometry only. is multi* the workaroun
On 25.06.2011 10:21, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> I have just tested geomconv for the first time. Good work.
> Geometry type conversion is a very useful feature.
> I agree with peppe that it would be nice to have the menu in layerview
> context menu
thanks, and thanks for all the issues you pointed o
On 25.06.2011 13:50, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Ede,
>
> Le 25/06/2011 13:28, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
>> i see there are multipolygon and such geometries (multi*s). would it make
>> sense to support a conversion into those?
>>
>> how is the multi* support in oj? as far as i can see feature
Hi all,
I'd like to release 1.4.1 within a few days.
Every test you can do with the very last version is welcome.
I have prepared 3 bundles here :
http://geo.michaelm.free.fr/OpenJUMP/resources/OpenJUMP1.4.1/
- openjump-1.4.1rc1.zip : should be equivalent to next NB. It is the
basic multi-OS v
Hi Martin,
I'd like to release OpenJUMP within few days.
To be able to use JTS 1.12 new features in my beanshell scripts, I
already use the last svn version of JTS.
As I know you want to release 1.12 very soon, my idea is to bundle last
svn version of JTS in OJ with the name jts-1.12rc1.jar
An
Sure, that sounds fine.
I'm really hoping to get JTS 1.12 out very soon, and I'm freezing the
features now, so the RC1 release should be pretty much identical to the
final one.
Martin
On 6/25/2011 1:50 PM, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I'd like to release OpenJUMP within few days.
>
Michael,
I can go one step further and create the final build of JTS 1.12. That
way you can release with the final version.
Let me know if you want to do this.
Martin
On 6/25/2011 5:06 PM, Martin Davis wrote:
> Sure, that sounds fine.
>
> I'm really hoping to get JTS 1.12 out very soon, and I
10 matches
Mail list logo