Re: [JPP-Devel] BizzJUMP Distro Available For Docking Window FrameworkDemo

2008-10-09 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Bing, Did you check out the trunk of my BizzJUMP SVN? The use of the substance look and feel should be removed from the source code inthe trunk. It should be using the InfoNode look and feel instead. As I mentioned in a previous e-mail, there are a lot of problems when the InfoNode docking window

Re: [JPP-Devel] BizzJUMP Distro Available For Docking Window Framework Demo

2008-10-09 Thread Larry Becker
I did get it to work by specifying a Java 1.6 in the batch file. My impressions of the docking framework are mixed. I remember it now from Paul's work. It looks kind of ugly and non-standard, but it may be worth it for the functionality. regards, Larry On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Sunburne

Re: [JPP-Devel] BizzJUMP Distro Available For Docking WindowFrameworkDemo

2008-10-09 Thread Bing Ran
SS, Yes, I was using the trunk and I removed the Substance LAF. The docking system manages lots of windows either as split panes or tabbed panes, which is pretty much what the desktop pane does. Thus what I call overlap. An internal frame containing docking windows looks heavy: one containing

Re: [JPP-Devel] BizzJUMP Distro Available For Docking WindowFrameworkDemo

2008-10-09 Thread Paul Austin
Check out http://www.vlsolutions.com/en/products/docking/ It's the one I like the best so far On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Bing Ran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SS, > > Yes, I was using the trunk and I removed the Substance LAF. > > The docking system manages lots of windows either as split pa