[JPP-Devel] Request informations about OpenJUMP Google Summer of Code 2008

2008-09-18 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi all, I would like to have some informations about the status of the OpenJUMP projects connected to Google Summer of Code 2008. As far as I remember there were: 1) JTIN, 2) Port of SEXTANTE to OpenJUMP. Is it correct? Thanks in advance. Peppe _

Re: [JPP-Devel] Request informations about OpenJUMP Google Summer of Code 2008

2008-09-18 Thread Stefan Steiniger
very short answer from Germany (i am traveling): JTIN (i.e. Christopher) has all code checked it at the SVN... but I have not found the time to test it. There is no separate Extensions.. so it right now only accessible for programmers (and one needs Java3d classes, which I haven't installed yet

Re: [JPP-Devel] Request informations about OpenJUMP Google Summer of Code 2008

2008-09-18 Thread Nacho Uve
> 2) Port of SEXTANTE to OpenJUMP. Is it correct? Just comment that is not a really port of SEXTANTE (it has many many functionalities). Is just a graphical modeller for chaining geospatial processes. I don't know the actual status of this project. br, Nacho > > Thanks in advance. > > Peppe

Re: [JPP-Devel] Request informations about OpenJUMP Google Summer of Code 2008

2008-09-18 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
The code for Christopher's JTin project is in the SVN. Christopher and I have talked, and I believe he will stay involved with OpenJUMP even though his summer project is completed. I hope he will do more work with JTin, or at least hang out to answer some of my questions. :] I also hope to do some

[JPP-Devel] Questions about GML 2

2008-09-18 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I'm doing some work converting GPX files into "waypoint observations" stored in GML 2. I want to be able to read the GML 2 files into OpenJUMP. I had a couple of questions that I thought you guys could help with: [1] I'm trying to figure out what the "header" of a GML 2 file should look like. I'll

Re: [JPP-Devel] Questions about GML 2

2008-09-18 Thread Paul Austin
Ideally GML documents should include a schema definition using xsi:schemaLocation but they rarely do. If they did you could use the XML parser to find that location and then parse the schema (not an easy task) and then map it automatically to a FeatureSchema. Again not an easy task as GML is hierar

Re: [JPP-Devel] Questions about GML 2

2008-09-18 Thread Martin Davis
I second Paul's idea about looking at the spec for examples. You need more gunk than is in your example - welcome to the wonderful world of XML... As for auto-determining input data types, there's two reasons we choose to provide a template containing this and other information - if the input f

Re: [JPP-Devel] Questions about GML 2

2008-09-18 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Paul wrote: "Ideally GML documents should include a schema definition using xsi:schemaLocation but they rarely do. If they did you could use the XML parser to find that location and then parse the schema (not an easy task) and then map it automatically to a FeatureSchema. Again not an easy task as

Re: [JPP-Devel] Questions about GML 2

2008-09-18 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Martin wrote: "As for auto-determining input data types, there's two reasons we choose to provide a template containing this and other information - if the input file is empty you still need to know the datatype in order to create a layer - the template made it easier to specify exactly which eleme