Well.
OJ sometimes seems more Developer-oriented than User-oriented, as also me (who
tried to write the help docs) can confuse :-(.
I do a proposal for it:
1) group all "Select.." menus in "Edit" menu in one submenu called "Selection"
2) Move "Edit geometry" and "Edit attributes" groups to "Edit"
Hello OpenJUMP-users,
we are proud to release a new version of the WFSPlugin for OpenJUMP.
Since some newly developed features (e.g. WFS-T fpr WFS 1.1.0) were
'hidden' in SVN for quite a while we consider the plugin to be stable
with this new features.
This release includes the following new fea
I never looked at this code, but from you wrote here
I, personally, would leave the interface in place.
Even if now only the TaskFrame class implements the
Task.TaskNameListener interface who can tell if in
some near or distant future some other class would need to???
An interface specify a "beha
Hi,
Unfortunately this release does not work at all with GeoServer 1.6 beta 3 that
happened to be on my computer. GetCapabilites goes fine with both WFS 1.0.0 and
1.1.0. However getFeature ends with this message on OJ screen:
[Fatal Error] loose.dtd:31:3: The declaration for the entity "HTML
Hei Peppe,
I "registered" your proposal. But one thing is, that the edit menu is
working on a different level than all the edit tools.
However, we/I need to think about it.
The select stuff could be moved to a select submenu as you proposed.
[can you add all the stuff you propose again to the wi
I've put together and released the user survey results. You can read a
summary of the survey results on my OpenJUMP blog. The blog post also
contains a link that you can use to download the text file with the
results if you wish.
http://openjump.blogspot.com/
The Sunburned Surveyor
-
We only had two names entered for the June OpenJUMP User Survey prize.
So it was pretty easy to pick a winner. After a coin toss "Schmidt
from Germany" was the user selected.
If Schmidt is interested in claiming his prize to have me work on a
bug or little plug-in, he can't get in touch with me at
Leandro and Christopher,
Can you guys send me two or three sentences explaining what you did on
you project this week and what you will be working on next week. I'll
then forward this to the OSGeo mailing list. (I don't need more than
one short paragraph, if that.)
Thanks,
Landon
--
Thanks for the reponses Paolo. I'm going back in to reexamine all of
the TaskFrame code today. After some tinkering yesterday I realize it
is best to proceed with a light hand.
The Sunburned Surveyor
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:29 AM, P.Rizzi Ag.Mobilità Ambiente
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never
Interesting results...
Maybe, It's a good idea make a new official release every 6 months (Ubuntu
way) or another period of time.
I like very much the feature proposal:
"Use Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Mapquest, Open Street Maps map layer as
background layer"
It will be a very very very good featur
Yes Nacho. I will need to talk to Stefan about making more regular
releases. Once every 6 months is likely a doable goal. Something that
was mentioned previously on the list was making a release whenever we
meet a certain criteria, like N number of bugs fixed or something like
that.
I think it is
The problem with the following proposal is not a technical one, it is a
legal one. Google and the other providers typically only allow access to
their tile layer using their web sites and web APIs. This is in part because
they license the data from other parties for a specific purpose.
Paul
> I
ok.. let me note another problem [which includes the nice kml proposal
as well]:
We don't have a implementation of projections. So everything that relies
on that is not doable before we get this implemented
Stefan
PS: @Larry, did you also implement KML write or only read for SkyJUMP?
Paul Aus
se the extra tab and then try to add another one
you'll get a null pointer exception. I'm working on this problem.
You can download the first version of OpenJUMP Small Business Edition
(SBE) here:
http://www.redefinedhorizons.com/shared_files/openjump-20080704.zip
You can download the so
I've attached the two (2) source code files with some of my recent
clean-up/changes. (This doesn't include any of the docking window
framework or look-and-feel changes.) Please review my changes to these
two (2) classes if you have concerns before I commit to the core.
I'll commit next week if the
Hei,
I am not sure if I like the idea that you call your distribution
OpenJUMP SBE since it is not a community "product" that we (as JPP)
released. It can be any xxxJUMP but not OpenJUMP.
So I suggest a larger name change.
cheers,
Stefan
btw: I thought SB is not for "Small Business" but for "
Landon,
before you commit such changes I would like to
a) review it (sorry, I have not found the time yet to read all your
emails on that subject), which may need some time.
b) get an agreement by other programmers [Larry, Paul, Andreas, Michael]
that these changes are of benefit.
c) know whic
17 matches
Mail list logo
