Hi all,
on OpenJUMP the Merge it was possible to substitute the value of attributes
using a tool "Replace value", from Layer menu.
I think this tool could be very useful ported in OpenJUMP. I ask if it is
possible. Thanks
Peppe
Hai un indirizzo email difficile da ricordare?
Scegli q
There is always the " -properties workbench-properties.xml" switch. Just
modify it to point to another path.
Larry
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok... now the big question:
>
> how can tell OJ to use two workbecnh-properties files?
> because I don
Hi Peppe,
How is the "Replace value" tool different from the "Replace Attribute
Value" tool found under Tools -> Edit Attributes?
regards,
Larry
2008/7/3 Giuseppe Aruta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
> on OpenJUMP the Merge it was possible to substitute the value of attributes
> using a tool
See if you can follow this logic.
The Task class declares an internal interface named TaskNameListener.
This internal interface contains a single methor,
taskNameChanged(String argName). There is only one class that
implements this interface, TaskFrame.
However, TaskFrame never uses the String ar
I have made the following minor changes to improve the TaskFrame class
and related classes:
- Changed the WorkbenchFrame.getInternalFramesAssociatedWith(TaskFrame
argTaskFrame) method access from private to public.
- Changed the WorkbenchFrame.getTaskFramesAssociatedWith(LayerManager
argLayerManag
Hei Larry,
Want I meant is a bit different (sorry for all the spelling errors). My
problem is that I want to provide 2 property files. In Eclipse I tried
it with 2 times calling -properties with different files, but then it
picks only the first one.
Stefan
Larry Becker wrote:
> There is alway
:)
it should be the same, as I ported it - but renamed it for clarification
stefan
Larry Becker wrote:
> Hi Peppe,
>
> How is the "Replace value" tool different from the "Replace Attribute
> Value" tool found under Tools -> Edit Attributes?
>
> regards,
> Larry
>
> 2008/7/3 Giuseppe Aruta
I'm sure that would be a relatively easy mod to the code that loads the
workbench-properties. We can define a convention that your
workbench-properties file will be called, say, my-workbench-properties.xml.
Then all we have to do is add the "my-" and load it too.
regards,
Larry
On Thu, Jul 3, 20
mhm.. that is a interesting and simple (=doable) idea :)
one could actually also fix the name for the standard file, e.g.
standard-plugins.xml or stdplugin-config.xml or so
stefan
Larry Becker wrote:
> I'm sure that would be a relatively easy mod to the code that loads the
> workbench-propertie
