> 27 years of experience. 8-)
Good for you! Larry.
Anyhow my interest is to explore the possibility to
have a simplified version of OJ for PDA.
I am testing this possibility between OJ developers.
Nothing to get in 2 month, of coarse. But simply a
sort of project similar to GvSIG mobile
(http
--- Giuseppe Aruta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto:
BTW Edgar Soldin's job on CRS and GPS is on this way.
Also your Skyjump KML import/export plugin.
>
> > 27 years of experience. 8-)
>
> Good for you! Larry.
>
> Anyhow my interest is to explore the possibility to
> have a simplified versi
Paul Austin a écrit :
> I would like to extend the Task class to support properties. Properties
> can be set by plug-ins on the task. An example of a property would be
> the SRID for the whole task. This will allow us to support extended
> metadata on tasks without having to add new methods each
Well,
as I don't own a gps mouse, primarly the now unfunctional input has to
be tested. So anybody owning a device is a potential tester. Volunteers
wanted :)
Anything else depends on that. I would suggest I'll fix that and we'll
see what should be done else.
Btw. If the cts extension isn't in
Michael,
The magic is new in JDK 1.5 generics. It's a generic method the
means that at compile time it should deduce anywhere it sees T (T can be
anything you want) in the method based on the actual classes used.
So in the below example we use T as the return type so the compiler can
pick t
Paul wrote: "I would like to extend the Task class to support
properties. Properties
can be set by plug-ins on the task."
I wonder if we could use a Blackboard and PersistentBlackboardPlugIn
to accomplish this?
http://jump-pilot.sourceforge.net/javadoc/openjump_javadoc/com/vividsolutions/jump/wor
Larry wrote: "Some might be able to do it in a couple of hours, and
some might take a couple of weeks."
I'm one of those programmers. :]
SS
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Giuseppe Aruta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Giuseppe Aruta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
> scritto:
>
>
> BTW Edgar Soldin's
in general I support Pauls idea, although I am wondering what has been
happened to the first request on adding a Projection property to the Taks.
But Paul, can you also say why it is better to have properties than
using the blackboard? I could imagine, that one simply knows what type
of propert
--- Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ha scritto:
> Larry wrote: "Some might be able to do it in a
> couple of hours, and
> some might take a couple of weeks."
>
> I'm one of those programmers. :]
>
> SS
That means: are you between the "couple of hours"? Or
betwee the "couple of weeks"?
