Re: [JPP-Devel] Question about JTIN design decision

2008-05-21 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Chris, You've asked some good questions, and I'm glad Paul got back to you a lot sooner than I did. Paul wrote: "I would not extend Geometry for the TinFace, subclassing Geometry is not something that works will in the current JTS code base. I would just have a custom TinFace class which could be

Re: [JPP-Devel] Question about JTIN design decision

2008-05-21 Thread Larry Becker
It seems that there are currently only two paths to layers: Layer and Layerable. Layer has been used for Geometry and Layerable (AFAIK) has been used for image layers (WMS and SID). Either way you go, you will probably be going where no one has gone before. If you are going to generate the polyg

Re: [JPP-Devel] Question about JTIN design decision

2008-05-21 Thread Paul Austin
Chris, I have some examples on adding your own renderer. The example displays a regular grid on the map and allows you to zoom to a mapsheet grid cell by name. You can get the source for my plugins at http://rsiaf.googlecode.com/svn/rs-jump-core/trunk/ Create your renderer class for your s

Re: [JPP-Devel] Question about JTIN design decision

2008-05-21 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Paul, This is a topic of interest to me, since I did some work on pluggable rendering in OpenJUMP a year or two ago. You said that: "Create your renderer class for your sub class of layerable then register it to be used to render instances of that type." When was the setRendererFactory class ad