Hei Christopher
thanks for your outline :)
I actually have not that much background knowledge to evaluate if what
you do propose is good, but I guess you know it better. But modularity
is always a plus and documentation is sufficient. However.. a good rule
is to always start with a simple model
Dear SS (and others)
Could you let me know ehat the status is for the use of Java 1.6 - has a
decision been made to move OpenJump, or is it still a work in progress.
Geoff
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hei Christopher
>
> thanks for your outline :)
> I actually have not that much background knowled
good question. We could move on for OJ 1.3 to j1.6. But I would rather
like to have info first how far the java 1.6 adaption on systems such as
Debian, Suse and MacOSX is. I.e. to have compatibility for at least
another OJ version.
stefan
Geoffrey G Roy wrote:
> Dear SS (and others)
>
> Could
Java 1.6 on Mac OSX is still beta:
http://developer.apple.com/java/
"Java SE 6 Developer Preview 9
Apple has released a new developer preview of Java SE
6 for Leopard. Click on the Java Downloads link to the
right."
--Christopher
--- Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> good question.
thanx chris
so what concerns me, this will defer any upgrade.
stefan
Christopher schrieb:
> Java 1.6 on Mac OSX is still beta:
>
> http://developer.apple.com/java/
> "Java SE 6 Developer Preview 9
> Apple has released a new developer preview of Java SE
> 6 for Leopard. Click on the Java Downloa
