Hi,
When planning this new binary feature format, could you try to think if it
could be made to support transactions (delete, update, insert) through
transactional Web Feature Service? There has been discussion on Geoserver user
list that with shapefiles are not actually suitable for WFS-T bac
Let me get back to you on this Jukka.
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 4/4/07, Rahkonen Jukka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
When planning this new binary feature format, could you try to think if it
could be made to support transactions (delete, update, insert) through
transactional Web Feature Se
Shapefile readers often use the rownum in the file as the FID -- you need to
define a standard for including a surrogate key column (Oracle this is the PK,
SDE/PGDB it's the OID).
Probably need a metadata portion and content portion for the file format.
Have you thought about binary GML? There
I'm hoping you guys might be able to help me out with a Java problem I'm
having.
I can't seem to find a way to determine if a JAR file contains a class that
implements a particular interface. I need to be able to do discover this
programmatically. If the JAR file does contain an implementation of
If I remember correctly, for JUMP it was quite slow to determine this
programatically (I think you have to instantiate every class in the jar). So
instead we search based on the _name_ of the class, i.e., *PlugIn.class.
You should be able to do the same in your case if all classes that implement
