> Hi Paolo,
>
> Nice to hear you, you surely have a good experience about
> database-access.
> I like the idea of an embedded database.
> I have made some tests in the past with jump+hsqldb, but I didn't get
> any memory improvement (I have not much dbms knowledge and I may have
> done mistakes
Hi Paolo,
>Hi Michaël,
>I'm sorry but I don't have any experience with HSQL, H2, or Derby,
>so I can't tell how they would perform in JUMP, both from a speed
>and a memory-use point of view.
>
>
At least, your database experience is welcome ;-)
>This aside, I found that having a "real", albei
This message is directed mostly at Frank, but I included the JPP mailing
list in case other JPP Developers want to comment.
I've been thinking some more about a binary format for the exchange of
features, and I have been taking a look at the API for Java's
DataInputStream class and DataOutputStre
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> This message is directed mostly at Frank, but I included the JPP mailing
> list in case other JPP Developers want to comment.
>
> I've been thinking some more about a binary format for the exchange of
> features, and I have been taking a look at the API for Java's
>
Frank,
I think we can work together towards a solution that will work for the both
of us. I'll revisit the specification I posted earlier and make some changes
that it supports multiple features. I will also sketch up a format for a
binary index.
For my needs in OpenJUMP I can just use the same
