Stefan,
Yup I removed all classes not in the org.jmat package.
Paul
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hei Paul,
>
> sorry for asking the question,
>
> but why did you send the lib? did you remove some classes?
>
> stefan
>
> Paul Austin schrieb:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> I think for now we should just pa
Hei Paul,
sorry for asking the question,
but why did you send the lib? did you remove some classes?
stefan
Paul Austin schrieb:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I think for now we should just pare down the jar file to remove the
> unwanted packages and then worry about migrating at a later date. See
> attac
Hei Paul,
>Hi Stefan,
>
>Yup I was looking at jmat 5.0, if the API is the same can we upgrade to
>the newer and still supported jmathtools?
>
>
>
mhm.. there is actually a (small) problem.
with the jmathtools (i.e. the math-array) package the guy switched from
object oriented matrix processing
Hi Stefan,
Yup I was looking at jmat 5.0, if the API is the same can we upgrade to
the newer and still supported jmathtools?
Paul
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hei Paul,
>
> interesting. I have never looked in detail what the lib contains.
> I guess you were looking at jmat 5.0?
> the lib: jmathtoo
Hei Paul,
interesting. I have never looked in detail what the lib contains.
I guess you were looking at jmat 5.0?
the lib: jmathtools is a bit different
stefan
Paul Austin wrote:
>I was just looking at the jmat library and they bundle a whole bunch of
>extra libraries in their jar file. This m
