I thought that it has been working but probably I was wrong and at least r4401
(2015-04-18) gives the same error. I attached SRID 4326 for the layer with the
Layer - Set SRID tool because it looks like degree wants to know it but it does
not help.
There is something commented out in
https://so
did that work at some point in the past in my port, meaning after r4219? ..ede
On 14.12.2015 11:41, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> How to reproduce:
>
>
>
> - Create a layer, digitize any feature on it, select the feature and
> press the WFS button. The plugin is supposed to take the
Thanks you for that, Ede,
Michaël
Le 13/12/2015 13:05, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
> hey Mike,
>
> i renamed the the WFS plugin repository to make clear it is obsolete by now.
>
> also i took the freedom to commit your changes to the language file to core.
> http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilo
hey Mike,
i renamed the the WFS plugin repository to make clear it is obsolete by now.
also i took the freedom to commit your changes to the language file to core.
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/4604
..ede
--
On 12.12.2015 22:11, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Ede,
hey Mike,
> Can you explain to me how the wfs plugin is packaged and distributed.
> I updated the language file in the plug-ins/WFSPlugin directory, but
> checking the
> pom, I realize that the plugin distributed with OpenJUMP is taken from
20. syyskuuta 2015 13:49
> Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
> Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] WFS plugin does not set Content-Type for GetFeature
>
> On 16.09.2015 22:24, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't read features from my WFS with the OJ WFS plugin. However,
:49
Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] WFS plugin does not set Content-Type for GetFeature
On 16.09.2015 22:24, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't read features from my WFS with the OJ WFS plugin. However, by using
> the Request and Response t
On 16.09.2015 22:24, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't read features from my WFS with the OJ WFS plugin. However, by using
> the Request and Response tags the result is OK. The difference seems to be
> that the real GetFeature request that should get data for me map is sent
> withou
On 21.12.2014 17:51, Michael Michaud wrote:
> Hi Ede,
>
>> i just had a look at the currently defunct WFSPlugin in our svn and brought
>> it back to life. i am going to integrate it into CORE for easier
>> maintenance, but it'll need 6.5MB dependencies. so we have two possibilities
>> A. add the
I would prefer it in PLUS rather than Core, because I don't think there
are so many out there that would use a WFS daily.
I am just thinking that 6MB does not sound a lot... but in other parts
of the world downling another 6MB may make a difference.
cheers,
stefan
Am 21.12.14 14:23, schrieb Gi
Hi Ede,
I think that having a working WFS plugin is an important goal for OpenJUMP.
I am much more interested to have it into CORE. 6.5 Mb is noy a big
quantity.
Peppe
2014-12-21 17:13 GMT+01:00 :
> ok,
>
> i just had a look at the currently defunct WFSPlugin in our svn and
> brought it back to
Hi Ede,
> i just had a look at the currently defunct WFSPlugin in our svn and brought
> it back to life. i am going to integrate it into CORE for easier maintenance,
> but it'll need 6.5MB dependencies. so we have two possibilities
> A. add these to CORE 20MB + 6.5 = 26MB
> B. add them only to P
Hei Jukka,
thanx for hint. I added it to the plugin list and also your description
on an extra page:
http://openjump.org:8739/wiki/show/WFS+PlugIn+Description
please feel free to edit or add "credits" ;)
stefan
Rahkonen Jukka schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that WFS plugin is missing from the pl
he desired spatial operation from
the spatial tab.
Hope this helps,
-Jukka Rahkonen-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Roman Isitua
Sent: Tue 3.7.2007 11:05
To: Stephan Holl
Cc: OPENJUMP user QA forum
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] WFS Plugin 1.0.0
Hello Stephan,
Thanks,
Hello Stephan,
Thanks, it worked with OJ 1.2b. I have another
question, after specifying a criteria e.g a spatial
criteria, how do you execute it? I noticed that once I
click the advance button to specify a criteria the ok
button cannot be seen.
Best regards
Roman
_
Hello Roman,
Roman Isitua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [20070701 - 16:13:55]
> Hi guys,
>
> I just downloaded the wfs plugin with the required
> libraries. I installed jai 1.1.2 (the jdk version).
> When using the wfs plugin, after entering my url
> e.g
> http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs?request=getf
MAIL PROTECTED]
>> Puolesta Stefan Steiniger
>> Lähetetty: 14. joulukuuta 2006 11:09
>> Vastaanottaja: List for discussion of JPP development and use.
>> Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] WFS Plugin (again)
>>
>> actually i thought about havin a look on it to make an
>> externa
Hi,
Another thing about WFS, Sigle JUMP seems to use same WFS 1.0 support
that was in deeJUMP before forwarding to 1.1. It has problems with
MapServer, as Ugo has informed:
MapServer does not seem to crash so it is obviously repaired, but JUMP
side not. It could be useful for a number of users
ut it did not work for me.
Regards,
-Jukka-
> -Alkuperäinen viesti-
> Lähettäjä: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Puolesta Stefan Steiniger
> Lähetetty: 14. joulukuuta 2006 11:09
> Vastaanottaja: List for discussion of JPP development and use.
>
actually i thought about havin a look on it to make an external plugin.
But I am not able to improve it because there is not that much time to
figure out who WFS works and second you have a programmer :)
So just a small note:
How to start programming and making a hello world plugin with eclipse
Hello,
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Hi Ugo,
>
>
>
>>> Could it be possible to have
>>> WFS as a plugin so it could be used with any JUMP variety,
>>>
>> or is there
>>
>>> something fundamental that prevents it?
>>>
>> There's only one fundamental thing about this:
>> - Ressourc
Hi Ugo,
> > Could it be possible to have
> > WFS as a plugin so it could be used with any JUMP variety,
> or is there
> > something fundamental that prevents it?
> There's only one fundamental thing about this:
> - Ressources.
> Perhaps you have some available to help us. If not, we'd be
> hap
Jukka,
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I meant just that, external plugin. I am a bit baffled with these internal
> plugins (there are suchthings, aren't?) and external plugins, which are often
> but not always called as extensions :)
>
> I have a feeling that there might be some need for furth
Hi,
I meant just that, external plugin. I am a bit baffled with these internal
plugins (there are suchthings, aren't?) and external plugins, which are often
but not always called as extensions :)
I have a feeling that there might be some need for further development of JUMP
WFS, perhaps it wo
Ok.. thats a bit heavy.
So we should try to make an external plugin. But maybe a few other
people have a different opinion.
stefan
Ugo Taddei schrieb:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I think he meant having it as a plugin. If you opt for a thin core, then
> you can rule out the WFS. It depends on deegree (wei
Hi,
I understood Jukka's request the same way as Ugo : an external plugin
compatible with all jump versions.
Having a thin core and many plugins is also my preferred option.
I don't know if the plugin framework is ready to manage features as jump
version compatibility and plugin dependencies, bu
Hi Stefan,
I think he meant having it as a plugin. If you opt for a thin core, then
you can rule out the WFS. It depends on deegree (weighing in 3,5 MB) plus
a few other libs (mainly for XML parsing and HTTP stuff).
Cheers,
Ugo
> Hei Jukka,
>
> so if i understand correctly you would like to have
Hei Jukka,
so if i understand correctly you would like to have the WFS function in OJ?
@all: anybody against this idea (opting for a thin core ;)
stefan
Rahkonen Jukka schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I do know there is deeJUMP with WFS support and I am even lucky enough
> to have an old deeJUMP supporting
> Jonathan Aquino wrote:
>> There's a flavor of JUMP called deeJUMP that I've heard has WFS support.
> True, but I should warn you that it supports WFS version 1.1. only.
>
> AFAIK, the WFS Adapter has been recently integrated in OpenJUMP. I
> haven't tested it though.
>
to make it even more comple
Jonathan Aquino wrote:
> There's a flavor of JUMP called deeJUMP that I've heard has WFS support.
True, but I should warn you that it supports WFS version 1.1. only.
AFAIK, the WFS Adapter has been recently integrated in OpenJUMP. I
haven't tested it though.
Cheers,
Ugo
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
Title: Message
There's a flavor of JUMP called deeJUMP that I've heard has WFS
support.
Jon
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Juliana BarrosSent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:32
PMTo: List for discussion of JPP devel
31 matches
Mail list logo
