Your right, Peppe. There is certainly a role for both formats and no
need to limit ourselves to only one.
regards,
Larry
On 9/18/07, Giuseppe Aruta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are right Larry, the problem is that working with
> HTML means to separate the original opendoc in
> different page
You are right Larry, the problem is that working with
HTML means to separate the original opendoc in
different pages, since "save to" HTML page saves to
only one big page, difficult to manage.
I have no idea how to split the opendoc and save it to
different HTML saving the links between them.
More
Hi Peppe,
HTML is no harder than PDF and works much the same. Just work as
normal and choose Save As (HTML) from OpenOffice Writer (or Word).
regards,
Larry
On 9/18/07, Giuseppe Aruta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> the idea of using PDF was strictly connected to
> "internationalization"
Hi,
the idea of using PDF was strictly connected to
"internationalization" of OpenJUM, since it is easier,
I think, to translate quickly any word/openwriter docs
in pdf. I have no idea how to work in html :-<.
Peppe
--- P.Rizzi Ag.Mobilità Ambiente
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> In Windows si
