my 2 cents:
do what you want, but the GPL notice is necessary.
I personally add my own name for the copyright... because one never
knows if one can need the code for something else.
stefan
Pedro Doria Meunier schrieb:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Everyone
>
> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone
This topic again?
If you don't mind me asking... what's the need to discuss copyrights
again?
Is there a **need** for it?
I, for once, agree with Landon on his last remark: neutral, 3rd party,
licensing ...
Shoot me for perhaps being a
That works for me Paul. I'm not going to push the copyright issue
until someone else feels that it is important.
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 9/18/07, Paul Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to use the following header for my new classes, if at some
> point JPP becomes an actual Organizat
I'm going to use the following header for my new classes, if at some
point JPP becomes an actual Organization then I'll be happy to use that
instead.
/* *
The Open Java Unified Mapping Platform (OpenJUMP) is an extensible
Paul,
If you want to have a standard copyright holder maybe we could say
something like:
"Copyright held by Vivid Solutions and other contributors."
SS
On 9/18/07, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I copyright everything we write in our company's name (ISA). Since
> everything is GPL,
Paul,
This question does not have a simple answer. I'll do my best to
provide an explanation.
Vivid Solutions holds the copyright for all of the original JUMP
source code. Most code in OpenJUMP that is not part of the original
JUMP code is held by the respective programmers or their
organizations
I copyright everything we write in our company's name (ISA). Since
everything is GPL, I think the important thing is for someone to claim
copyright, since only the copyright holder can relicense.
regards,
Larry
On 9/18/07, Paul Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a standard copyright he
