---Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob
> Atkinson
> Sent: June 4, 2007 6:08 PM
> To: Justin Deoliveira
> Cc: List for discussion of JPP development and use.; Sunburned Surveyor;
> Geotools-Devel list
> Subject: Re: [JPP-De
development and use.; Sunburned Surveyor;
Geotools-Devel list
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] [Geotools-devel] Common Feature model
good one, Justin.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A common java feature model would be great. This is essentially what
the
> geoapi project strives to achie
Hi Jordy,
When we spoke at Refractions 6 months ago you were in the middle of some
major changes to the model, have these been completed and released now?
If so I will look at these for use by my readers.
The approach I have taken in the work that I have integrated into my
JUMP plugi-ins is to ha
good one, Justin.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi,
A common java feature model would be great. This is essentially what the
geoapi project strives to achieve.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geoapi/
Last year a couple of developers took a run at the interfaces for a
feature model that definit
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Paul wrote: "Here are the requirements I have.
>
Here are the requirements I had:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Feature+Model+Design+Discussion
Each "aspect" has a discussion and happy little icons
This should answer some of your questions
> Id
Hi,
A common java feature model would be great. This is essentially what the
geoapi project strives to achieve.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geoapi/
Last year a couple of developers took a run at the interfaces for a
feature model that definitely meets the requirements you list below. You
can
