ok,
so I guess, we let them do our upgrade?
I am fine with either one. So if after the release Michael wishes to
upgrade that is ok too.
Good thing to know is that the Mediawiki will stay in place for a while
more. As you know developers have a personal project home as well -
already on Alura.
On 06.04.2013 15:06, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Ede,
>
> Do you mean we should let them migrate the project ?
yes.
> I think we can undertake this migration just after 1.6 release.
why bother.
> Have we got a backup of the wiki ? I remember you did that,
> but don't know where it is / how it
Hi Ede,
Do you mean we should let them migrate the project ?
I think we can undertake this migration just after 1.6 release.
Have we got a backup of the wiki ? I remember you did that,
but don't know where it is / how it works.
What about the automatic build system for snapshots ?
Is it part of
ok,
we now have a definitive deadline for sf.net changing us over to the new
platform. here's what they wrote
> We're going to start upgrading active projects starting on Monday, April
> 22, starting with the longest-inactive and moving forward. Since each
> upgrade takes a different amount of t
