Stefan,
Yup I removed all classes not in the org.jmat package.
Paul
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hei Paul,
>
> sorry for asking the question,
>
> but why did you send the lib? did you remove some classes?
>
> stefan
>
> Paul Austin schrieb:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> I think for now we should just pa
Hei Paul,
sorry for asking the question,
but why did you send the lib? did you remove some classes?
stefan
Paul Austin schrieb:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I think for now we should just pare down the jar file to remove the
> unwanted packages and then worry about migrating at a later date. See
> attac
Hei Paul,
>Hi Stefan,
>
>Yup I was looking at jmat 5.0, if the API is the same can we upgrade to
>the newer and still supported jmathtools?
>
>
>
mhm.. there is actually a (small) problem.
with the jmathtools (i.e. the math-array) package the guy switched from
object oriented matrix processing
Hi Stefan,
Yup I was looking at jmat 5.0, if the API is the same can we upgrade to
the newer and still supported jmathtools?
Paul
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hei Paul,
>
> interesting. I have never looked in detail what the lib contains.
> I guess you were looking at jmat 5.0?
> the lib: jmathtoo
Hei Paul,
interesting. I have never looked in detail what the lib contains.
I guess you were looking at jmat 5.0?
the lib: jmathtools is a bit different
stefan
Paul Austin wrote:
>I was just looking at the jmat library and they bundle a whole bunch of
>extra libraries in their jar file. This m
I was just looking at the jmat library and they bundle a whole bunch of
extra libraries in their jar file. This may cause problems if we decide
to update those libraries.
The affected packages include
org.apache.xerces (partial)
org.apache.xml.serialize (partial)
org.jdom
org.w3c.dom
org.xml.sa
