On 14.07.2011 16:57, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Packaging a windows version is a bit of extra work. I don't use the
> installer nor the .exe, even if I'm a windows user, but I think this is
> useful for a better adoption of OpenJUMP. I would be pleased to study
> multiplatform installers like IzPa
Hi Ede,
>> I've modified it but I've not yet committed,
Done, but will need more check.
> we talked about a new version scheme and maybe now it is the time to do so.
> How about three number only
> ..
> major is changed when really big changes occur, e.g. backward compatibility
> breaks, oj runs
On 14.07.2011 13:03, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>> i see only xml files in trunk that seem to organize the nightly build. where
>> are the ant build files located?
> ant build file is in the etc directory.
> I've modified it but I've not yet committed,
ok thanks
> I think I will switch the cod
Hi,
> i see only xml files in trunk that seem to organize the nightly build. where
> are the ant build files located?
ant build file is in the etc directory.
I've modified it but I've not yet committed,
I think I will switch the code to 1.4.2alpha today, not make an official
release of a patched
On 13.07.2011 22:04, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Le 13/07/2011 21:26, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
>> ahh ok, good to know. i do not use ant. while you are at it. how about
>> switching back to _one_ jar. i can't see a valid reason to separate
>> workbench, all i see are lots of dependencies betwe
Le 13/07/2011 21:26, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
> ahh ok, good to know. i do not use ant. while you are at it. how about
> switching back to _one_ jar. i can't see a valid reason to separate
> workbench, all i see are lots of dependencies between the two jars.
You're right. It could make sens
ahh ok, good to know. i do not use ant. while you are at it. how about
switching back to _one_ jar. i can't see a valid reason to separate workbench,
all i see are lots of dependencies between the two jars.
also. isn't there a wildcard adding possible with ant, preventing this for the
future?
Hi,
I'm sorry that net package misses in 1.4.1.
Unfortunately, it has not been added to the ant build file after Ede
replaced old sun classes by these free ones, and I did not notice it
because it seems it does not prevent to connect to wms url as long as it
is not secured url.
Not sure how NB
On 13.07.2011 10:41, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested WMS basic authentication for Ede some time ago and it did work then
> with the nightly build that Ede showed me. However, it looks like something
> went wrong with the OJ 1.4.1 release.
> When trying to connect with WMS url like
> "
Hi,
I tested WMS basic authentication for Ede some time ago and it did work then
with the nightly build that Ede showed me. However, it looks like something
went wrong with the OJ 1.4.1 release.
When trying to connect with WMS url like "https://username:password@server...";
the result is this
10 matches
Mail list logo
