Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ

2012-05-02 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.04.2012 20:03, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Eric, Ede, >> - the last improvement is about the OJ-PLUS startup. As you mentioned in >> some previous email, the OJ-PLUS is quite slow. >> I was a bit curious so I decided to have a look to understand the reason. >> Here it is (time results based

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ

2012-04-29 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi Eric, Ede, - the last improvement is about the OJ-PLUS startup. As you mentioned in some previous email, the OJ-PLUS is quite slow. I was a bit curious so I decided to have a look to understand the reason. Here it is (time results based on my laptop configuration, i.e. Ubuntu 32-bits 4Go): -

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ : svg export

2012-04-27 Thread edgar . soldin
no problem, how could you have known? .. any input is welcome, especially when you agree with me of course ;). ..ede On 27.04.2012 14:24, Eric Grosso wrote: > I answered during you did it too. Sorry for this repetition :-) > > Eric > > On 27 April 2012 12:40, mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> > wr

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ : svg export

2012-04-27 Thread Eric Grosso
I answered during you did it too. Sorry for this repetition :-) Eric On 27 April 2012 12:40, wrote: > exactly my point ;) .. ede > > On 27.04.2012 12:31, Eric Grosso wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Why don't remove this limit and using it in a OK/Cancel dialog which > could be displayed if there

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ : svg export

2012-04-27 Thread edgar . soldin
exactly my point ;) .. ede On 27.04.2012 12:31, Eric Grosso wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Why don't remove this limit and using it in a OK/Cancel dialog which could be > displayed if there is an important certain number of objects such as > "Due to the important number of objects, the generated SVG f

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ : svg export

2012-04-27 Thread Eric Grosso
Hi Michael, Why don't remove this limit and using it in a OK/Cancel dialog which could be displayed if there is an important certain number of objects such as "Due to the important number of objects, the generated SVG file will have an important size and the process may be long (several minutes).

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ : svg export

2012-04-27 Thread edgar . soldin
On 27.04.2012 12:01, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Eric >> >> >> Bug: the export in SVG works well for small datasets but doesn't work >> for important ones (creation of a kind of strange noisy image >> but not in a SVG format, except for the file extension). If it's just >> an extract of the impor

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ : svg export

2012-04-27 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi Eric > > > Bug: the export in SVG works well for small datasets but doesn't work > for important ones (creation of a kind of strange noisy image > but not in a SVG format, except for the file extension). If it's just > an extract of the important dataset, the export is done without > any probl

Re: [JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ : query layer-name

2012-04-27 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi Eric, > Possible improvements: > - improve the output layer name of the AttributeQuery > plugIn > (com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.plugin.analysis.AttributeQueryPlugIn); > at the moment, the name is something like it NAMELAYER-operator, e.g. > buildings-=, resulting from the following co

[JPP-Devel] Some possible improvements in the last OJ

2012-04-25 Thread Eric Grosso
Hi, I tested a bit more the last version of OJ. I found a small bug and some improvements to possibly do. Bug: the export in SVG works well for small datasets but doesn't work for important ones (creation of a kind of strange noisy image but not in a SVG format, except for the file extension). If